2017
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000001209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Impact of Integrated Stigma Mitigation Interventions in Improving HIV/AIDS Service Delivery and Uptake for Key Populations in Senegal

Abstract: Background:Men who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW) are consistently shown to have a higher burden of HIV compared with other adults in Senegal. This study, HIV Prevention 2.0, evaluates the impact of the 3-tiered integrated stigma mitigation interventions (ISMIs) approach to optimizing HIV service delivery for key populations in Senegal.Methods:Baseline assessment includes a questionnaire and biological testing for HIV. A proportion of participants enrolled into a 24-month longitudinal coh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such interventions, on their own and in combination with ART scale‐up have been shown to be effective , cost‐effective and feasible among MSM, and so their expansion should not be delayed. As same‐sex practices remain criminalized in Senegal, and MSM face discrimination , it is also important that effective stigma mitigation interventions are combined with these interventions to ensure their effectiveness .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such interventions, on their own and in combination with ART scale‐up have been shown to be effective , cost‐effective and feasible among MSM, and so their expansion should not be delayed. As same‐sex practices remain criminalized in Senegal, and MSM face discrimination , it is also important that effective stigma mitigation interventions are combined with these interventions to ensure their effectiveness .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Such interventions, on their own and in combination with ART scale-up have been shown to be effective [46,[50][51][52][53], cost-effective [54,55] and feasible among MSM, and so their expansion should not be delayed. As same-sex practices remain criminalized in Senegal, and MSM face discrimination [56], it is also important that effective stigma mitigation interventions are combined with these interventions to ensure their effectiveness [25]. Our findings suggest little impact is achieved from reducing risk or increasing ART coverage among other population subgroups, including FSW, further emphasizing the need to focus new interventions on MSM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3] Even across concentrated and generalized HIV epidemics in West African countries, *2 in 10 MSM in Burkina Faso, 1 in 10 MSM in The Gambia, and 1 in 4 MSM in Benin and Senegal are living with HIV. [4][5][6][7][8] In the more generalized HIV epidemics in the same region, where HIV consistently exceeds 1% among pregnant women, 9 the relative increase in the burden of HIV among MSM compared with other populations is more pronounced, such is the case of Cote d'Ivoire, which has reported up to 16 times higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the broader population. 2,[10][11][12][13][14] MSM have been defined as MSM, regardless of whether or not they also have sex with woman or have a personal or social gay or bisexual identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyons et al 11 described “ The potential impact of integrated stigma mitigation interventions in improving HIV/AIDS service delivery and uptake for key populations in Senegal .” Men who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW) in Senegal were the target populations for the HIV Prevention 2.0 study that assessed the impact of an integrated stigma mitigation intervention to optimize HIV service delivery in Senegal. Over 24 months, 758 FSW and 724 MSM participated in the baseline assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%