1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01039707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential gradient along semiconductor-surface projections in an external electric field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial guess was that there was a distance offset in our calibrations due to penetration into the plates of the calibration electric field. The problem is that a quasi-static electric field can propagate a finite distance into a semiconductor (see, e.g., [45]); this distance is determined by the combined consideration of diffusion and field driven electric currents, leading to an effective field penetration length (Debye-Hückel length)…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Debye Screening Length?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our initial guess was that there was a distance offset in our calibrations due to penetration into the plates of the calibration electric field. The problem is that a quasi-static electric field can propagate a finite distance into a semiconductor (see, e.g., [45]); this distance is determined by the combined consideration of diffusion and field driven electric currents, leading to an effective field penetration length (Debye-Hückel length)…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Debye Screening Length?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If V −V s is large compared to k b T , the effective penetration depth increases because the charge density is modified in the vicinity of the surface. The potential in the plates is no longer a simple exponential, however one can define an effective shielding length [45]…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Debye Screening Length?mentioning
confidence: 99%