2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00710-018-0589-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for offsetting diamond mine carbon emissions through mineral carbonation of processed kimberlite: an assessment of De Beers mine sites in South Africa and Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to ex-situ mineralization is the carbonation of mafic or ultrabasic mine waste tailings, such as the kimberlite mines in South Africa (e.g. Mervine et al, 2017) and the brucite mine tailings at the Mount Keith nickel mine (e.g. Harrison et al, 2012;Wilson et al 2014).…”
Section: Ex-situ Mineralisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to ex-situ mineralization is the carbonation of mafic or ultrabasic mine waste tailings, such as the kimberlite mines in South Africa (e.g. Mervine et al, 2017) and the brucite mine tailings at the Mount Keith nickel mine (e.g. Harrison et al, 2012;Wilson et al 2014).…”
Section: Ex-situ Mineralisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mine tailings represent a small mitigation opportunity that would consume <36 MtCO 2 /yr and require potential transportation and large disposal areas (National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2019). Still, mine tailings have a high uptake potential of carbon and mines that carbonate their tailings could offset on-site CO 2 -eq emissions (Harrison et al, 2013;Mervine et al, 2018). Figure 2 summarizes data on the rate of carbon mineralization of mafic and ultramafic mine tailings in contact with air, and in contact with more CO 2 rich gases and fluids.…”
Section: Surficial Carbon Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Ca exchange was performed on two samples that appeared to contain smectites (one contained smectite, the other interstratified illite-smectite). This was done using the method described by Mervine et al (2018) in order to Results of test quantification of µXRF using various extraction grids of a hydrothermally altered rock sample. Quantification was done on individual pixels (1 × 1), and grids of 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 9 × 9 pixels using the Bruker M4 software.…”
Section: Quantitative X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%