2013
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for Electropositive Metal to Reduce the Interactions of Atlantic Sturgeon with Fishing Gear

Abstract: Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrhynchus) populations have been declared either endangered or threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Effective measures to repel sturgeon from fishing gear would be beneficial to both fish and fishers because they could reduce both fishery-associated mortality and the need for seasonal and area closures of specific fisheries. Some chondrostean fishes (e.g., sturgeons and paddlefishes) can detect weak electric field gradients (possibly as low as 5 Μv/cm) due to arrays … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Records of shark depredation of electronic biologgers suggest electroreceptive attraction (Kerstetter, Polovina, & Graves, 2004) and Porsmoguer, Bănaru, Boudouresque, Dekeyser, and Almarcha (2015) found that magnets on hooks increased catch rates of blue shark (Prionace glauca; Carcharhinidae). Other recent research demonstrates deterrent effects of electropositive metals, magnets, and semiochemical repellents on by-catch of sharks and sturgeon, although results are temperature-and species-specific and may be superceded by social cues when fishes aggregate (Bouyoucos, Bushnell, & Brill, 2014;Brill et al, 2009;Hutchinson et al, 2012;O'Connell, Stroud, & He, 2012;Robbins, Peddemors, & Kennelly, 2011).…”
Section: Sensory Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Records of shark depredation of electronic biologgers suggest electroreceptive attraction (Kerstetter, Polovina, & Graves, 2004) and Porsmoguer, Bănaru, Boudouresque, Dekeyser, and Almarcha (2015) found that magnets on hooks increased catch rates of blue shark (Prionace glauca; Carcharhinidae). Other recent research demonstrates deterrent effects of electropositive metals, magnets, and semiochemical repellents on by-catch of sharks and sturgeon, although results are temperature-and species-specific and may be superceded by social cues when fishes aggregate (Bouyoucos, Bushnell, & Brill, 2014;Brill et al, 2009;Hutchinson et al, 2012;O'Connell, Stroud, & He, 2012;Robbins, Peddemors, & Kennelly, 2011).…”
Section: Sensory Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.) or incorporation of electropositive metals into fishing gear (Bouyoucos et al., ) can help to reduce bycatch of AS in riverine fisheries.…”
Section: Major Anthropogenic Habitat Impacts and Emerging Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gear modification investigations to limit the bycatch of Atlantic Sturgeon have ranged from the use of experimental nets (Fox et al 2013; Pingguo and Jones 2013) to the incorporation of electropositive metals for behavioral deterrence (Bouyoucos et al 2014). Musick and Hager (2007) found that increasing twine size, augmenting the hanging ratio, and removing tie‐downs all significantly reduced the retention rate of captive Atlantic Sturgeon under controlled or captive conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%