2002
DOI: 10.1080/20025891106781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for Bioremediation of Uranium-Contaminated Aquifers with Microbial U(VI) Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
194
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
194
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, U contaminated settings such as mine sites, mill tailings, and sites where nuclear weapons have been manufactured have been studied directly by field observations or indirectly in laboratory experiments in which sediment and water samples collected from the field have been used to simulate in situ biogeochemical processes. The laboratory amendment of field sediments with organic substrates as electron donors to stimulate anaerobic microbial respiration typically results in significant removal of U from the pore water within a short period (< 1 month) (Abdelouas et al, 1999;Abdelouas et al, 2000;Finneran et al, 2002a;Finneran et al, 2002b;Suzuki et al, 2002;Elias et al, 2003a;Nevin et al, 2003;Suzuki et al, 2003;North et al, 2004;Gu et al, 2005a;Senko et al, 2005b;Tokunaga et al, 2005;Wan et al, 2005). No U(VI) reduction has been observed in the abiological controls, which strongly suggests that U(VI) reduction is biologically mediated.…”
Section: Redox Transformations Of U In U-contaminated Settingsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Accordingly, U contaminated settings such as mine sites, mill tailings, and sites where nuclear weapons have been manufactured have been studied directly by field observations or indirectly in laboratory experiments in which sediment and water samples collected from the field have been used to simulate in situ biogeochemical processes. The laboratory amendment of field sediments with organic substrates as electron donors to stimulate anaerobic microbial respiration typically results in significant removal of U from the pore water within a short period (< 1 month) (Abdelouas et al, 1999;Abdelouas et al, 2000;Finneran et al, 2002a;Finneran et al, 2002b;Suzuki et al, 2002;Elias et al, 2003a;Nevin et al, 2003;Suzuki et al, 2003;North et al, 2004;Gu et al, 2005a;Senko et al, 2005b;Tokunaga et al, 2005;Wan et al, 2005). No U(VI) reduction has been observed in the abiological controls, which strongly suggests that U(VI) reduction is biologically mediated.…”
Section: Redox Transformations Of U In U-contaminated Settingsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This was associated with a marked increase in the abundance of Geobacter species in the groundwater (Elifantz et al, 2008;Mouser et al, 2009b). Geobacter species are known Fe(III)-and U(VI)-reducing microorganisms and are considered to be responsible for most of the dissimilatory metal reduction in these acetate-amended subsurface sediments (Lovley, 1991;Finneran et al, 2002;Holmes et al, 2002Holmes et al, , 2005Anderson et al, 2003;Istok et al, 2004;Vrionis et al, 2005). Within a period of 20 days of acetate addition, the uranium concentration in D02 was reduced by more than 80%, starting at an initial background concentration of about 130 mg l À1 and diminishing to values well below the EPA maximum contaminant level (30 mg l À1 ) by the end of the study period (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a strategy for bioremediation of uraniumcontaminated groundwater is to accelerate the growth of Geobacter species with the addition of acetate to promote reductive precipitation of uranium (Anderson et al, 2003;Chang et al, 2005;N'Guessan et al, 2008). Studies with Geobacter sulfurreducens demonstrated that selective pressure for faster growth on Fe(III) oxides, the primary electron acceptor supporting Geobacter growth during uranium bioremediation (Finneran et al, 2002), resulted in replicate strains, which accumulated mutations that increased the production of microbial pili (Reguera et al, 2005(Reguera et al, , 2006 and other proteins that enhance the rate of Fe(III) oxide reduction (Tremblay et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%