Potential Fault Diagnosis Method and Classification Accuracy Detection of IGBT Device Based on Improved Single Hidden Layer Feedforward Neural Network

Abstract

Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) is a high-power switch in the field of power electronics. Its reliability is closely related to system stability. Once failure occurs, it may cause irreparable loss. Therefore, potential fault diagnosis methods of IGBT devices are studied in this paper, and their classification accuracy is tested. Due to the shortcomings of incomplete data application in the traditional method of characterizing the device state based on point frequency parameters, a fault diagnosis method based on full frequency threshold screening was proposed in this paper, and its classification accuracy was detected by the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm. The randomly generated input layer weight ω and hidden layer deviation lead to the change of output layer weight β and then affect the overall output result. In view of the errors and instability caused by this randomness, an improved Finite Impulse Response Filter ELM (FIR-ELM) training algorithm is proposed. The filtering technique is used to initialize the input weights of the Single Hidden Layer Feedforward Neural Network (SLFN). The hidden layer of SLFN is used as the preprocessor to achieve the minimum output error. To reduce the structural risk and empirical risk of SLFN, the simulation results of 300 groups of spectral data show that the improved FIR-ELM algorithm significantly improves the training accuracy and has good robustness compared with the traditional extreme learning machine algorithm.

Retracted: Potential Fault Diagnosis Method and Classification Accuracy Detection of IGBT Device Based on Improved Single Hidden Layer Feedforward Neural Network

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”