2012
DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0b013e328357bf04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential contribution of femoroacetabular impingement to recurrent traumatic hip dislocation

Abstract: A 16-year-old boy sustained a traumatic posterior dislocation of the right hip. After initial closed reduction, the hip spontaneously redislocated within 2 days. Four days after the initial dislocation, the patient was transferred to the authors' institution, where a radiographic workup showed a severe capsular and labral disruption from the posterior aspect of the acetabulum. Subsequently, the patient underwent operative treatment using the technique of surgical hip dislocation through a digastric osteotomy a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the data in our study matches the theory of the case report [2], and is concordant with other publications [1,3]. The case report neither reports an original …”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In conclusion, the data in our study matches the theory of the case report [2], and is concordant with other publications [1,3]. The case report neither reports an original …”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…18 In an exclusively athletic population with low-energy subluxation or dislocation and posterior acetabular rim fracture, cam and/or pincer impingement has been identified in 64% to 82% of subjects. [19][20][21] Athletes with larger degrees of motion (eg, dancers, gymnasts) ( Figure 1) may have impingement-induced instability without abnormal cam or pincer deformities. In a cohort of 59 professional ballet dancers, only 1 hip had evidence of a cam deformity, whereas several other abnormalities were identified on magnetic resonance imaging because of a dynamic "pincer" mechanism from the extreme motion involved with their activity (or extraarticular impingement).…”
Section: Soft Tissue Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to achieve a concentric reduction of the hip after closed reduction has been reported in up to 25% of the cases [2]. Most often, failure to achieve a concentric reduction is caused by intra-articular interposition of soft tissues, including the acetabular labrum and osteochondral fragments from the femoral head [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Therefore, imaging evaluation after closed reduction is mandatory in order to assess the concentricity of the reduction, identify potential damaged hip structures and plan for treatment accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%