1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1981.tb00102.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced‐cultivation Systems for cereal production in temperate regions

Abstract: Summary: The effects of reduced‐cultivation Systems on weeds in cereals are reviewed. Increasing dependence of these Systems upon Chemical weed control together with changes in the soil physical environment are expected to modify existing weed floras. Annual‐grass weeds are likely to remain a problem with the use of minimal cultivations, particularly when early drilling is practised, while hitherto unimportant species may become more prevalent, e.g. Bromus spp. Furthermore, reduced cultivations may encourage t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
79
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(37 reference statements)
8
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Average density of annual broad-leaved weeds was 1.5 plants per m 2 without any differences between the tillage practices (Table 2). This finding concerning the annual broadleaved weeds is contradictory to some studies (Cussans 1976, Froud-Williams et al 1981, Buhler 1995 but concurs with some other reports (Wrucke and Arnold 1985). The perennial weed species Calystegia sepium (L.) R.Br., Convolvulus arvensis L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Rumex crispus L., Lythrum salicaria L. and Symphytum officinale L. as dicotyledonous species, and Equisetum arvense L. as a cryptogamous species, made up only 12% of the total weed populations, but with a significantly higher abundance by 3% in CP and DH than in CT tillage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Average density of annual broad-leaved weeds was 1.5 plants per m 2 without any differences between the tillage practices (Table 2). This finding concerning the annual broadleaved weeds is contradictory to some studies (Cussans 1976, Froud-Williams et al 1981, Buhler 1995 but concurs with some other reports (Wrucke and Arnold 1985). The perennial weed species Calystegia sepium (L.) R.Br., Convolvulus arvensis L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Rumex crispus L., Lythrum salicaria L. and Symphytum officinale L. as dicotyledonous species, and Equisetum arvense L. as a cryptogamous species, made up only 12% of the total weed populations, but with a significantly higher abundance by 3% in CP and DH than in CT tillage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Ch. album and P. aviculare, the characteristic species in mouldboard ploughing (Froud-Williams et al 1981), occurred in our trials in the DH/CT and CT/DH tillage treatments with densities of 15 plants per m 2 that were 3 times higher than those found in mouldboard ploughing (CT). The abundance of these weed populations probably reflected the effect of tillage on the seedbank size and seedling distribution in the soil layer as well wheat competitiveness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The general trend of conservation tillage practices for cereal crops under different climatic and soil conditions was found in recent reviews by Brown and North (1984), Butorac et al (1986), Légère et al (1990), Arshad et al (1994). The observation of weed species under conservation tillage suggested that the replacement of conventional tillage based on ploughing by conservation tillage caused changes in the composition of weed species (Froud-Williams et al 1981). However, other studies reported that most weeds showed no consistent response to tillage (Pollard at al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Froud-Williams et al (1981) predicted that reduced tillage would result in an increase in annual grass species, perennials, volunteer crops and wind-dispersed species, whereas annual broadleaf species would decrease. Canadian studies testing these predictions yielded inconsistent results .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%