Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based, low-cost, non-medical
treatment approach for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. This study
aimed to start and assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of a PR
programme on health and quality of life of respiratory patients, for the first
time in primary care in Crete, Greece and, particularly, in a low-resource rural
setting. This was an implementation study with before–after outcome evaluation
and qualitative interviews with patients and stakeholders. In a rural primary
healthcare centre, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
and/or asthma were recruited. The implementation strategy included adaptation of
a PR programme previously developed in United Kingdom and Uganda and training of
clinical staff in programme delivery. The intervention comprised of 6 weeks of
exercise and education sessions, supervised by physiotherapists, nurse and
general practitioner. Patient outcomes (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD
Assessment Test (CAT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Patient
Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT)) were
analysed descriptively. Qualitative outcomes (feasibility, acceptability) were
analysed using thematic content analysis. With minor adaptations to the original
programme, 40 patients initiated (24 with COPD and 16 with asthma) and 31
completed PR (19 with COPD and 12 with asthma). Clinically important
improvements in all outcomes were documented (mean differences (95% CIs) for
CCQ: −0.53 (−0.81, −0.24), CAT: −5.93 (−8.27, −3.60), SGRQ: −23.00 (−29.42,
−16.58), PHQ-9: −1.10 (−2.32, 0.12), ISWT: 87.39 (59.37, 115.40)). The direct PR
benefits and the necessity of implementing similar initiatives in remote areas
were highlighted. This study provided evidence about the multiple impacts of a
PR programme, indicating that it could be both feasible and acceptable in
low-resource, primary care settings.