2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40337-022-00581-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential benefits and limitations of machine learning in the field of eating disorders: current research and future directions

Abstract: Advances in machine learning and digital data provide vast potential for mental health predictions. However, research using machine learning in the field of eating disorders is just beginning to emerge. This paper provides a narrative review of existing research and explores potential benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations of using machine learning to aid in the detection, prevention, and treatment of eating disorders. Current research primarily uses machine learning to predict eating disorder statu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A growing body of literature has demonstrated the advantages of ML over traditional techniques for predicting prognosis and treatment outcomes across a range of psychiatric conditions including depression (Chekroud et al, 2016), obsessive-compulsive disorder (Lenhard et al, 2018), schizophrenia (Min et al, 2020), and social anxiety disorder (Månsson et al, 2015). However, the use of ML in ED research is still in its infancy (Fardouly et al, 2022), thus we encourage future research to also consider exploring whether ML may be used to enhance our ability to predict outcomes of digital interventions for EDs. To facilitate optimal ML performance, we encourage researchers to collaborate by pooling multiple datasets from clinical trials, as larger datasets generally produce more precise prediction models.…”
Section: Limitations Of Studies and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of literature has demonstrated the advantages of ML over traditional techniques for predicting prognosis and treatment outcomes across a range of psychiatric conditions including depression (Chekroud et al, 2016), obsessive-compulsive disorder (Lenhard et al, 2018), schizophrenia (Min et al, 2020), and social anxiety disorder (Månsson et al, 2015). However, the use of ML in ED research is still in its infancy (Fardouly et al, 2022), thus we encourage future research to also consider exploring whether ML may be used to enhance our ability to predict outcomes of digital interventions for EDs. To facilitate optimal ML performance, we encourage researchers to collaborate by pooling multiple datasets from clinical trials, as larger datasets generally produce more precise prediction models.…”
Section: Limitations Of Studies and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML provides exciting potential for detecting, preventing, and treating psychiatric disorders. However, many factors limit its current use in research and practice [ 61 - 63 ]. Data is arguably the most apparent constraint in developing ML models for diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders [ 61 ].…”
Section: Limits In the Current Applicability Of Machine Learning Algo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many factors limit its current use in research and practice [ 61 - 63 ]. Data is arguably the most apparent constraint in developing ML models for diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders [ 61 ]. In psychiatry, we do not have the comfort of rich numerical datasets such as those available in intensive care units.…”
Section: Limits In the Current Applicability Of Machine Learning Algo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, machine learning has demonstrated its capacity to enhance group classification without the need for researchers to specify variables ( 14 ). While still at an early stage in the study of ED, machine learning has emerged as an advanced computational too ( 15 , 16 ). Cerasa et al applied the support vector machine (SVM) technique to distinguish individuals with eating disorders from healthy controls (HCs), achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 0.80 in a small sample of ED vs. HCs ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%