2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158841
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Application of the Oryza sativa Monodehydroascorbate Reductase Gene (OsMDHAR) to Improve the Stress Tolerance and Fermentative Capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR; EC 1.6.5.4) is an important enzyme for ascorbate recycling. To examine whether heterologous expression of MDHAR from Oryza sativa (OsMDHAR) can prevent the deleterious effects of unfavorable growth conditions, we constructed a transgenic yeast strain harboring a recombinant plasmid carrying OsMDHAR (p426GPD::OsMDHAR). OsMDHAR-expressing yeast cells displayed enhanced tolerance to hydrogen peroxide by maintaining redox homoeostasis, proteostasis, and the ascorbate (AsA)-li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cDNA containing the open reading frame (ORF) of OsMDHAR and OsDHAR was subcloned into the yeast expression vector p426GPD (yeast 2 μ expression vector with URA3 marker; GenBank Accession No. DQ019861), which allows constitutive expression of a target gene under the control of the yeast GPD (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) promoter 36 . To measure cell viability, cells (1 × 10 6 cells per mL) grown at 28 °C overnight were inoculated in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% dextrose) and cultured for 8 h. Mid-log phase cells (OD 600 ≈ 3.0) were exposed to 20 mM H 2 O 2 for 1 h at 28 °C and serially diluted (10 0 to 10 −4 ) with YPD medium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cDNA containing the open reading frame (ORF) of OsMDHAR and OsDHAR was subcloned into the yeast expression vector p426GPD (yeast 2 μ expression vector with URA3 marker; GenBank Accession No. DQ019861), which allows constitutive expression of a target gene under the control of the yeast GPD (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) promoter 36 . To measure cell viability, cells (1 × 10 6 cells per mL) grown at 28 °C overnight were inoculated in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% dextrose) and cultured for 8 h. Mid-log phase cells (OD 600 ≈ 3.0) were exposed to 20 mM H 2 O 2 for 1 h at 28 °C and serially diluted (10 0 to 10 −4 ) with YPD medium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific properties of yeast can be altered via genetic improvement through numerous approaches, including sexual breeding, parasexual hybridization, random mutagenesis, metabolically genetic engineering such as genome editing, and transformation using recombinant genes [37][38][39]. Using transgenic biotechnology, yeast is engineered to express foreign and exogenous genes to generate products of industrial interest, such as bioethanol-based biofuel and secondary metabolites [37,40,41]. Owing to their academic and industrial interests, studies on stress tolerance in yeast are of fundamental scientific importance [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This carrying capacity also reflects the ability of yeast cells to respond to oxidative damage by producing viable offspring or survivors, which sometimes is called stress tolerance assays. These studies represent the capacity of the cells to counteract and resist the oxidative damage, representing cell survival [ 30 , 31 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Even showing statistical differences between applied doses, and being significantly different from completely stressed yeasts (OxDinOxD) and unstressed ones (YPD), our results indicate that tested compounds enhance biological functions enabling the complete recovery of cell biochemistry and metabolism Indeed, tested compounds counteract the oxidative damage induced by the used H 2 O 2 medium and increase significantly the oxidative protection rate when compared to resveratrol ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%