2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential application of macroinvertebrates indices in bioassessment of Mexican streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the diversity metrics, the Shannon Index [114] was chosen since it is considered to be a robust tool that takes into account both evenness and species richness. The higher the values of the Shannon Index, the greater the diversity and the healthier the ecosystem [114,115]. In our case, the Shannon Index showed healthy sites at the PR headwaters (sampling sites 1-3), while also singling out the most degraded sites (Supplementary Material A/ Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the diversity metrics, the Shannon Index [114] was chosen since it is considered to be a robust tool that takes into account both evenness and species richness. The higher the values of the Shannon Index, the greater the diversity and the healthier the ecosystem [114,115]. In our case, the Shannon Index showed healthy sites at the PR headwaters (sampling sites 1-3), while also singling out the most degraded sites (Supplementary Material A/ Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Previous studies have linked macroinvertebrate-feeding ecology with environmental conditions, suggesting that the FFG's metrics detect stressors from multiple spatial scales [36,[116][117][118]. In addition, it has been observed that anthropogenic activities alter the availability of food sources, producing important variations in the distribution and relative abundance of FFG [36,57,115]. The FFG metrics selected for the PR were collector-gatherers (percentage), predators (richness and percentage), and herbivores (richness and percentage).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering all the reported impacts, it can be pointed out that biodiversity is threatened by anthropic activities that cause a deterioration in ecosystems and/or the extinction of local biota, making biodiversity one of the factors used as an impact assessment tool (Serrano Balderas et al, 2016). Biological communities can be applied as biological indicators as they reflect multiple anthropogenic pressures in aquatic ecosystems, and benthic macroinvertebrates are the most commonly used group (Baptista et al, 2013;Callisto et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect to show that the MMI can effectively represent the difference between the different lake ecosystems by human disturbance, as well as verify whether the assessment of lake ecosystem health through MMI is different from traditional physical and chemical index assessment methods. At the same time, we analyzed various environmental factors affecting the ecology according to the land use types and vegetation growth around the lake, which is considered vital for the protection and management of the lake ecosystem and can provide theoretical support for its protection and restoration as well [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%