Current Developments in Solid State NMR Spectroscopy 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-3715-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and Limitations of 2D 1H-1H Spin-Exchange CRAMPS Experiments to Characterize Structures of Organic Solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the H-H distances in a CH 3 or NH 3 group are similarly close as compared to that in a CH 2 group, there is usually a fast rotation of the CH 3 or NH 3 group about the CÀC or N-C bond direction at room temperature. 94,95 Such a fast rotation causes a scaling of the H-H dipolar coupling by a factor of |(1/2)(3cos 2 b À 1)|, where b is the angle between the internuclear vector and the axis of rotation, i.e., the intra-CH 3 or intra-NH 3 H-H dipolar couplings are scaled by a factor of 0.5, since b = 901. As a consequence, there is a reduced perturbing effect due to CH 3 or NH 3 groups as compared to the case for a rigid CH 2 group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the H-H distances in a CH 3 or NH 3 group are similarly close as compared to that in a CH 2 group, there is usually a fast rotation of the CH 3 or NH 3 group about the CÀC or N-C bond direction at room temperature. 94,95 Such a fast rotation causes a scaling of the H-H dipolar coupling by a factor of |(1/2)(3cos 2 b À 1)|, where b is the angle between the internuclear vector and the axis of rotation, i.e., the intra-CH 3 or intra-NH 3 H-H dipolar couplings are scaled by a factor of 0.5, since b = 901. As a consequence, there is a reduced perturbing effect due to CH 3 or NH 3 groups as compared to the case for a rigid CH 2 group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by using a very short CP contact time; however, this prevents magnetization from reaching isolated non‐protonated carbons (such as unprotonated aromatic or carboxyl carbons). A promising alternative is the LG‐CP method, which greatly suppresses the 1 H‐ 1 H dipolar interactions, as confirmed by the observation of intense transient dipolar oscillation, and is further corroborated by the observation of multiplets consistent with the number of J ‐coupled protons (Brus et al, 2002). Thus, LG‐CP suppresses 1 H‐ 1 H dipolar interactions which, in turn, greatly suppress spin diffusion, allowing one to study intra‐ molecular correlations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This arises from 1 H‐ 1 H spin exchange occurring for both z and spin‐locked transverse 1 H magnetization (as is the case under Hartmann‐Hahn CP conditions) (Hartmann and Hahn, 1962). Under sample rotation the dipolar coupling is scaled by 50% in the locked field, leading to a slowdown in the spin‐exchange by 50% during the CP processes in comparison to that experienced during standard spin‐exchange, which takes place in the z direction (Brus et al, 2002). Thus, spin diffusion takes place at a slower rate during the CP process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible formation of a 50:50 mixture between two polymorphs was ruled out by 1 H T 1 measurements which provided the same value for all 1 H atoms. 15 Indeed, according to a simplified but reliable approach, 28 the spin diffusion process averages 1 H T 1 when protons belong to the same phase or in the case of homogeneous samples on a nanometer scale. 29 On the other hand, protons with different relaxation times belong to different domains with an average 20 linear dimension of greater than about 100 Å and vice versa.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%