2021
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Analysis of Enhanced Oil Recovery by Superheated Steam during Steam‐Assisted Gravity Drainage

Abstract: Figure 14. H 2 S mole fraction in the gas phase of the two schemes at the 2922th day. a) scheme 1#. b) 50 C superheat scheme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K h is the horizontal permeability of reservoir, K v is the vertical permeability of reservoir, K ro is the relative permeability of crude oil, K rw is the relative permeability of the formation water, μ o is the formation oil, μ is the formation water viscosity, B o is the formation crude volume coefficient, B w is the formation water volume coefficient, α is the unit conversion factor, r eh is the drain radius of the horizontal parallel segment, S is the horizontal wellbore skin factor, A o is the microsegment drainage area of horizontal well, and r w is the sieve tube diameter [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K h is the horizontal permeability of reservoir, K v is the vertical permeability of reservoir, K ro is the relative permeability of crude oil, K rw is the relative permeability of the formation water, μ o is the formation oil, μ is the formation water viscosity, B o is the formation crude volume coefficient, B w is the formation water volume coefficient, α is the unit conversion factor, r eh is the drain radius of the horizontal parallel segment, S is the horizontal wellbore skin factor, A o is the microsegment drainage area of horizontal well, and r w is the sieve tube diameter [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical simulation of reservoirs is the most applied method to evaluate steam injection technologies to determine the optimal strategy to enhance oil recovery. An important aspect to develop a simulation model is the kinetic model that should properly represent the reactions that are carried out at in situ conditions. ,, Various kinetic models have been reported in the literature for heavy oil upgrading at steam injection conditions. ,,,− General reaction schemes for the conversion of heavy oil or bitumen into different pseudocomponents and the reactions between them have been considered. Some kinetic models have been used for numerical simulation of steam injection during the in situ upgrading of heavy oil, focusing only on the production of gases, such as H 2 S or CO 2 , and not on all pseudocomponents involved in the reaction. ,,− Some of them use a reaction scheme based on different pseudocomponents, but only the liquid phase is studied in the numerical simulation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the western oil field of China, there are many thick oil and super thick oil blocks. To improve recovery, in addition to using CO 2 to reduce the viscosity of the crude oil, steam is also injected to improve oil washing efficiency and wave area again [9][10][11]. Given the increased corrosion of the recovery media caused by the artificial injection of CO 2 and high-temperature steam, 316L stainless steel is used for the crude oil recovery pipeline to cope with internal corrosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%