2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potent Henipavirus Neutralization by Antibodies Recognizing Diverse Sites on Hendra and Nipah Virus Receptor Binding Protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, HENV-103 approaches the HeV-RBP perpendicular to the receptor binding domain at the putative interface between protomers within the RBP tetramer ( Figure S4B ). This antigenic site overlaps with previously published mAbs, including HENV-32 ( Aguilar et al, 2009 ; Dong et al, 2020 ). In summary, HENV-103 and HENV-117 map to distinct antigenic sites by nsEM, with HENV-117 mimicking ephrin-B2 binding, while HENV-103 binds at the putative dimeric interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, HENV-103 approaches the HeV-RBP perpendicular to the receptor binding domain at the putative interface between protomers within the RBP tetramer ( Figure S4B ). This antigenic site overlaps with previously published mAbs, including HENV-32 ( Aguilar et al, 2009 ; Dong et al, 2020 ). In summary, HENV-103 and HENV-117 map to distinct antigenic sites by nsEM, with HENV-117 mimicking ephrin-B2 binding, while HENV-103 binds at the putative dimeric interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This mAb potently neutralizes both HeV and NiV in vitro and protects against infection and disease in experimental henipavirus challenge models using ferrets or non-human primates ( Bossart et al, 2011 ; Geisbert et al, 2014 ; Mire et al, 2016 ). More recently, two human mAbs, HENV-26 and HENV-32, were shown to neutralize HeV and NiV by distinct mechanisms and protect from NiV Bangladesh (NiV B ) strain challenge in a ferret model ( Dong et al, 2020 ). While these studies have laid a foundation for our understanding of how to target henipaviruses therapeutically, many questions remain regarding the antigenicity of the attachment glycoprotein, and whether escape mutations from these mAbs can develop in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The attachment protein (G) of henipaviruses is a type II protein with a tetrameric (dimer of dimers) structure and is the primary target for vaccines and therapeutics, as it is involved in binding host cellular receptors ephrin B2/B3 [11][12][13][14]. Indeed, several protective epitopes within henipavirus G have been characterised [15][16][17][18][19] and vaccination with HeV G has yielded promising results in several animal models [20][21][22][23][24]. This lead to the licensure of an equine vaccine in Australia and the progression of this vaccine candidate into human clinical trials [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A human monoclonal antibody (mAb) m102.4 has been administered as emergency PEP in 16 human cases and has demonstrated safety, tolerability and intended immunogenicity in phase 1 trials (13). Combinations of cross-reactive humanized antibodies against the fusion (F) protein and the RBP have also been described for clinical development as PEP (14–16), and a human vaccine using HeV-sG is now in phase 1 clinical trials (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%