2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potency Assessment of Dendritic Cell Anticancer Vaccine: Validation of the Co-Flow DC Assay

Abstract: For many years, oncological clinical trials have taken advantage of dendritic cells (DC) for the design of DC-based cellular therapies. This has required the design of suitable quality control assays to evaluate the potency of these products. The purpose of our work was to develop and validate a novel bioassay that uses flow cytometry as a read-out measurement. In this method, CD3+ cells are labeled with a fluorescent dye and the DC costimulatory activity is measured by the degree of T cell proliferation cause… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of the potency data among different batches was probably linked to the complexity of the method or to the intrinsic biological activity of cellular product; thus, method standardization or eventual replacement with other validated tests, such as the Co-Flow DC [ 14 ], should be considered. This cytofluorimetric method could allow the evaluation of the absolute number of proliferating T cells in co-culture with mDCs and a suboptimal amount of anti-CD3 antibody and the accurate live cell seeding using Annexin V assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variability of the potency data among different batches was probably linked to the complexity of the method or to the intrinsic biological activity of cellular product; thus, method standardization or eventual replacement with other validated tests, such as the Co-Flow DC [ 14 ], should be considered. This cytofluorimetric method could allow the evaluation of the absolute number of proliferating T cells in co-culture with mDCs and a suboptimal amount of anti-CD3 antibody and the accurate live cell seeding using Annexin V assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this in vitro assay does not allow to separate the degree of stimulation due to the presentation of alloantigens from that induced by the costimulatory activity of DCs. Alternatively, DCs’ costimulatory activity could be indirectly assessed by the expression analysis of phenotypic markers [ 11 ] or using other assays such as the COSTIM and Co-Flow DC assay [ 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, such assays, which are based on proliferation measured over several days and employ different donors, show intrinsic variability. Specifications also vary between laboratories and are based on the validation data (31,93,94,104,105) (Table 3). Thus, no standardized assays are defined for DCs.…”
Section: Dendritic Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potency assays may in some cases be used as a GMP release assay but are more likely employed in the validation phase and/or used for information only in the context of clinical trials. They may be performed before cryopreservation or on cryopreserved cells (31,93,94,104,105). Immunophenotyping to define the identity of the clinical grade DC products is therefore often used as surrogate for potency assays (positivity for CD11c, CD80/83/86, HLA-DR, CD209 and negativity for CD14, CD3 CD19), but the set of markers used and the specifications somewhat vary between laboratories (31,93,94,104,105).…”
Section: Dendritic Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%