2000
DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2000.84.4.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potato Late-Blight Management in the Toluca Valley: Forecasts and Resistant Cultivars

Abstract: We evaluated host resistance and fungicide forecasting as components of integrated management in the Toluca Valley of central Mexico. Potato cvs. Rosita and Norteña showed high levels of resistance (20 and 4% final disease severity, respectively) in the no-spray controls, whereas susceptible cv. Alpha was at 90% defoliation well before the end of the season. Disease on Alpha was well managed with a weekly spray of chlorothalonil. None of three published forecast systems was entirely appropriate for this pathos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Many reports show that partial resistance in the foliage may be used to complement fungicide applications to allow savings of fungicide by reduced application rates or extended intervals between applications (Bain et al 2008;Bradshaw and Bain 2007;Bus et al 1995;Clayton and Shattock 1995;Fry 1975Fry , 1977Fry , 1978Fry et al 1983;Gans et al 1995;Grünwald et al 2000;Nielsen and Bødker 2001;Nielsen 2004;Naerstad et al 2007a;Shtienberg et al 1994). Naerstad et al (2007a) showed that exploiting high foliage resistance to reduce fungicide input was risky when field resistance to tuber blight was low.…”
Section: Use Of Resistant Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports show that partial resistance in the foliage may be used to complement fungicide applications to allow savings of fungicide by reduced application rates or extended intervals between applications (Bain et al 2008;Bradshaw and Bain 2007;Bus et al 1995;Clayton and Shattock 1995;Fry 1975Fry , 1977Fry , 1978Fry et al 1983;Gans et al 1995;Grünwald et al 2000;Nielsen and Bødker 2001;Nielsen 2004;Naerstad et al 2007a;Shtienberg et al 1994). Naerstad et al (2007a) showed that exploiting high foliage resistance to reduce fungicide input was risky when field resistance to tuber blight was low.…”
Section: Use Of Resistant Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na primavera, foram cinco aplicações, sendo o número dessas, no modelo "Prophy", maior do que no modelo "Blitecast" devido a coleta das informações meteorológicas ser mais próxima das plantas (TRENTIN, O aumento da doença, associado às condições meteorológicas favoráveis, observadas a partir dos 45 DAE, nos dois experimentos, coincidiu com o período de crescimento dos tubérculos, quando a planta é mais suscetível à doença (GRÜNWALD et al, 2000). Na primavera o número de pulverizações nos tratamentos baseados no modelo de previsão "Blitecast" foi sempre menor do que 31% das aplicações semanais, enquanto que, no modelo "Prophy", foi menor do que 51% (Tabela 2).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Spray treatments were applied maximally one day before the actual start of the critical period. SIMCAST's (Grunwald et al, 2000(Grunwald et al, , 2002 fungicide units (FU's) were used to determine the remaining level of fungicide protection. Blightdays as described by Skelsey et al, (2009) were used to determine critical days, days with sufficiently long periods of leaf wetness to support infection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%