2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12230-012-9285-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potato Cultivar Response to Seasonal Drought Patterns

Abstract: The ability to minimize potato yield and quality losses due to drought can be greatly improved by understanding the relative responses of different cultivars to seasonal variations in water supply. To address this need, we initiated a 2 year field experiment to determine the responses of the six potato cultivars to different seasonal drought patterns, including 1) full season irrigation at 100 % ET, 2) irrigation at 100 % ET terminated during late bulking , 3) full season irrigation at 70 % ET , 4) irrigation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sadeghi-Shoae et al (2013) recorded a 25 % increase in the root yield of sugar beet under HA application with full irrigation. In this study, the increased tuber yield (+1.0 to +1.7 %) under WR5 with HA while saving 9.0 % of applied water confirmed the study of Stark et al (2013), who concluded that providing full irrigation through the mid- bulking stage, followed by a slow reduction in irrigation was the best strategy for reducing yield losses under insufficient water availability. Continuous water stress during entire growth periods (WR2) with HA resulted in small yield losses (−3.4 to −3.8 %) while saving 25 % of irrigation water (Table 6).…”
Section: Yield Losses and Water Savingsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sadeghi-Shoae et al (2013) recorded a 25 % increase in the root yield of sugar beet under HA application with full irrigation. In this study, the increased tuber yield (+1.0 to +1.7 %) under WR5 with HA while saving 9.0 % of applied water confirmed the study of Stark et al (2013), who concluded that providing full irrigation through the mid- bulking stage, followed by a slow reduction in irrigation was the best strategy for reducing yield losses under insufficient water availability. Continuous water stress during entire growth periods (WR2) with HA resulted in small yield losses (−3.4 to −3.8 %) while saving 25 % of irrigation water (Table 6).…”
Section: Yield Losses and Water Savingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results agree with Hassan et al (2002) who concluded that the stolonization and tuberization stages were more sensitive to water stress than the bulking stage. Increasing specific gravity at WR2 treatment supports the results of Stark et al (2013) who reported that as the soil dries, transpiration surpasses root water uptake for a period of time as the plants regulate to developing drought, thereby decreasing water content of tuber and increasing specific gravity. Starch content increased markedly with water stress in general, chiefly in WR5 over WR1 (average 15.3-17.3 % over WR1).…”
Section: Potato Tuber Quality Traitssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is subject to other natural factors such as weather, seasons and geography because of the growth cycle of natural raw materials [8] . A variety of harmful substances such as organic strong acids and heavy metals are present in the waste liquid produced in the process of synthesizing AD by this method [9] , it is not only difficult to deal with the waste liquid, but also causes unrecoverable pollution to the water environment and soil environment [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%