2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posture invariant surface description and feature extraction

Abstract: We propose a posture invariant surface descriptor for triangular meshes. Using intrinsic geometry, the surface is first transformed into a representation that is independent of the posture. Spin image is then adapted to derive a descriptor for the representation. The descriptor is used for extracting surface features automatically. It is invariant with respect to rigid and isometric deformations, and robust to noise and changes in resolution. The result is demonstrated by using the automatically extracted feat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An overview of several methods to analyze and model the human body is presented in [6]. Recent works on automatic landmarking try to make the automatic analysis more robust, for example against pose variation [7] and different body types [8]. Accuracy in automatic landmarking with methods non-optimized for scanner and poses seems, however, still an open problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of several methods to analyze and model the human body is presented in [6]. Recent works on automatic landmarking try to make the automatic analysis more robust, for example against pose variation [7] and different body types [8]. Accuracy in automatic landmarking with methods non-optimized for scanner and poses seems, however, still an open problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we introduce a correspondence field d : S →ℝ 3 which defines a pointwise correspondence between the source shape S and the target shape T . As already discussed in Section 2, there is a substantial amount of work in the field of non‐rigid correspondence estimation [BK10, RBBK10, WZL*10, WAS10, ZWW*10]. These methods solve the problem without making any assumptions about the initial alignment of the shapes but, unfortunately, tend to be costly.…”
Section: Methods Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of deformable registration approaches consists of the feature‐based methods. Several papers [WAS10, WZL*10, BK10, RBBK10] proposed to use local invariant geometric descriptors to compute a one‐to‐one mapping between corresponding features on the input shapes. However, detecting feature points and establishing the correspondence can be problematic especially in the presence of noise and missing data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondence computing is the key challenge in those methods, and Thin-plate spline (TPS) [1], [2] or radial basis function (RBF) [3] interpolation are commonly used. Several papers [4], [5], [6], [7] proposed to use local invariant shape descriptors to compute a one-to-one mapping.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%