2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posture and the emergence of manual skills

Abstract: In this paper, we examine how infants' natural manual and postural activities ± what they prefer and do week by week ± are related to developmental transitions in reaching skill and its neuromuscular control. Using a dense, longitudinal design, we tracked the manual and postural activities of four infants in a natural, free-play setting across the first year of life, and related these activities to two transitions in reaching as measured in a structured laboratory setting: the transition to reaching and the tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
2
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(44 reference statements)
5
64
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we were able to determine that, in unsupported sitting, infants decrease the amount of time that arms are used for postural support as sitting advances and reaching improves (Thelen & Spencer, 1998). This change in arm use, from a postural support to increasing object manipulation, agrees with past research on developing reach (Spencer et al, 2000;Rochat, 1992) in which the infants were protected from a loss of postural control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we were able to determine that, in unsupported sitting, infants decrease the amount of time that arms are used for postural support as sitting advances and reaching improves (Thelen & Spencer, 1998). This change in arm use, from a postural support to increasing object manipulation, agrees with past research on developing reach (Spencer et al, 2000;Rochat, 1992) in which the infants were protected from a loss of postural control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Spencer, Vereijken, Diedrich, and Thelen (2000) posited that sitting independently was associated with stable reaching. For example, Kamm (1995) coded the reaching and sitting progression in 5 infants from 8 weeks of age until they had one month of sitting experience.…”
Section: Reaching and Sitting Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object mouthing emerges early in infancy and increases between 15 and 20 weeks as reaching becomes productive (Rochat, 1989;Spencer, Vereijken, Diedrich, & Thelen, 2000). Mouthing peaks between 6 and 9 months and declines between 9.5 and 15.5 months, replaced by other forms of object exploration and manipulation (Belsky & Most, 1981;McCall, 1974;Palmer, 1989;Rochat, 1989;Ruff, 1984;Ruff et al, 1992;Whyte et al, 1994;Zelazo & Kearsley, 1980).…”
Section: Mouthing Peak and Consonant Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encountering novel information increases infants' chances of learning (Bradley-Johnson, Friedrich, & Wyrembelski, 1981;Rochat, 1989;Ruff, 1984) and contributes to cognitive and perceptual development (Bradley-Johnson et al, 1981;Ruff, 1984). Through exploration, therefore, infants play an active role in developmental change (Spencer et al, 2000).…”
Section: Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests certain forms of learning occur via the same pathway regardless of age (e.g., Chen & Siegler, 2000;Kuhn, Garcia-Mila, Zohar, & Andersen, 1995;Siegler & Chen, 1998), whereas other styles of learning arise from multiple pathways that change over time (Spencer, Vereijken, Diedrich, & Thelen, 2000). The process of learning involves progress, inconsistent patterns of generalization, regressions, and momentary transitional approaches, as well as qualitative and quantitative changes (Amso & Casey, 2006;Schauble, 1996;Siegler, 2005).…”
Section: Principles Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%