Postural stability and plantar pressure parameters in healthy subjects: variability, correlation analysis and differences under open and closed eye conditions

Abstract

Introduction: The “postural control system” acts through biomechanical strategies and functional neuromuscular adaptations to maintain body balance under static and dynamic conditions. Postural stability and body weight distribution can be affected by external sensory inputs, such as different visual stimuli. Little information is available about the influence of visual receptors on stabilometric and plantar pressure parameters. The aim of this study was to analyze variability, correlations, and changes in these parameters under open- (OE) and closed-eye (CE) conditions.Methods: A total of 31 stabilometric and plantar pressure parameters were acquired in 20 young and healthy adults during baropodometric examination performed in bipedal standing under both visual conditions. Variability of parameters was evaluated via the coefficient of variation, correlation analysis via Pearson’s R2, and statistical differences via the Wilcoxon test.Results: High intra-subject repeatability was found for all plantar pressure parameters and CoP-speed (CV < 40%) under OE and CE conditions, while CoP-sway area (CoPsa) and length surface function (LSF) showed larger variability (CV > 50%). Mean and peak pressures at midfoot and total foot loads showed the least number of significant correlations with other parameters under both visual conditions, whereas the arch-index and rearfoot loads showed the largest number of significant correlations. The limb side significantly affected most plantar pressure parameters. A trend of larger LSF and lower CoPsa and mean and peak pressures at the right forefoot was found under the CE condition.Discussion: The present study provides a deeper insight into the associations between postural stability and foot load. Interesting postural adaptations, particularly with respect to different visual stimuli, the effect of the dominant side, and the specific role of the midfoot in balance control were highlighted.

Contributions of cerebral white matter hyperintensities, age, and pedal perception to postural sway in people with HIV

“…Sway path and white matter hyperintensity Sullivan et al 1159 Factors contributing to sway were different with and without visual information and may be related to differential contributions from underlying physiological functioning. Specifically, the greater disparity between PWH and controls in sway path length when balance with eyes closed than with eyes open supports vision as a stabilizing force to override peripheral nervous system compromise of pedal sensory discrimination, which likely resulted in poor detection of plantar pressure [54] and possible peripheral or central nervous system compromise of vestibular responses [55]. Despite significant enhancement to stability from vision, older PWH were still impaired in the eyes-open condition relative to controls, implicating age-related decline in visual motion perception as contributing to imbalance even with the advantage of visual information [56].…”

Breathing, postural stability, and psychological health: a study to explore triangular links

“…Moreover, 3D stereophotogrammetry is also used for optoelectronic plethysmography to assess thoracic and abdominal movements during breathing ( Massaroni et al, 2017 ). For the analysis of body oscillations, force plate, and stabilometry are used to analyze postural stability parameters in open ( De Blasiis et al, 2023 ) and closed eyes ( Fullin et al, 2022 ), considering their reliability and variability too. Eventually, levels of psychological stress can be evaluated by wearable sensors.…”

Proprioception and Balance Control in Ankle Osteoarthritis and after Total Ankle Replacement: A Prospective Assessment

“…Proprioception, the sense of joint position and movement, is crucial for maintaining balance and coordinating movements. Its effects on postural stability can be quantitatively assessed under open and closed eyes conditions using a force platform, electronic mat, or accelerometers, which provide a more objective measurement than clinical scales despite an intra-and inter-subject variability of the computed posturographic parameters reported in previous studies [16,17].…”