2001
DOI: 10.1177/03635465010290031801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural Control after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Functional Rehabilitation

Abstract: Total sagittal knee laxity and postural control in the sagittal and frontal planes were measured in 25 patients at a mean of 36 months (range, 27 to 44) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and in a control group consisting of 20 uninjured age- and activity-matched subjects. Body sway was measured in the sagittal plane on a stable and on a sway-referenced force plate in single-legged stance, double-legged stance, or both, with the eyes open and closed. Postural reactions to perturbations in the sagi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
93
1
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
93
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies by Zätterström et al (19) and O'Connell et al (18) no differences were seen between injured limbs and non-injured limbs and the authors believe that this fact is due to a bilateral compromising in individuals with unilateral ACL injury. In individuals submitted to ACL reconstruction, Harrison et al (8) and Henriksson et al (17) did not see significant differences as well. Care must be taken when considering the non-injured lower limb as a normality parameter, while for a rehabilitation program, the non-injured lower limb shall not be neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the studies by Zätterström et al (19) and O'Connell et al (18) no differences were seen between injured limbs and non-injured limbs and the authors believe that this fact is due to a bilateral compromising in individuals with unilateral ACL injury. In individuals submitted to ACL reconstruction, Harrison et al (8) and Henriksson et al (17) did not see significant differences as well. Care must be taken when considering the non-injured lower limb as a normality parameter, while for a rehabilitation program, the non-injured lower limb shall not be neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many methods have been used to evaluate postural control aiming to quantify this disorder for enabling a better follow-up on the evolution of surgical or conservative treatment of patients with this kind of injury. Strength platform and its adjustments are the instruments most frequently used to measure balance of individuals with ACL injury or submitted to any kind of treatment (8,10,17,18,19) . No papers describing the use of pressure sensors for that purpose, such as the F-SCAN MATT, were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5,7 It has been well established that rehabilitation programs focused on improving neuromuscular control, strength, and range of motion improve postural control and self-reported function in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI), [8][9][10] acute ankle sprains, 11 and patellofemoral pain. 12,13 Although traditional therapeutic exercises have been effective in improving postural control after injury, a variety of treatment approaches can be used to improve balance after joint injury. 14 Clinicians are beginning to introduce gaming consoles, computer vision technology, and virtual reality into rehabilitation protocols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%