2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.012312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postulates for measures of genuine multipartite correlations

Abstract: A lot of research has been done on multipartite correlations. However, it seems strange that there is no definition of so called genuine multipartite correlations. In this paper we propose three reasonable postulates which each measure or indicator of genuine multipartite correlations (or genuine multipartite entanglement) should satisfy. We also introduce degree of correlations which gives partial characterization of multipartite correlations. Then, we show that covariance does not satisfy two postulates and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
112
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genuine correlations represent the amount of correlations that cannot be accounted for considering any of the possible reduced subsystems: An n-partite state has genuine n-partite correlations if it is non-product in every bipartite cut (this definition is in agreement with the general criteria given in Ref. [11]). According to this criterion, genuine total correlations T (n) ( ) coincide with the distance, measured through the relative entropy, between and the closest state with no n-partite correlations, that is, the closest state which is product at least along a bipartite cut [13].…”
Section: Genuine Multipartite Correlationssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genuine correlations represent the amount of correlations that cannot be accounted for considering any of the possible reduced subsystems: An n-partite state has genuine n-partite correlations if it is non-product in every bipartite cut (this definition is in agreement with the general criteria given in Ref. [11]). According to this criterion, genuine total correlations T (n) ( ) coincide with the distance, measured through the relative entropy, between and the closest state with no n-partite correlations, that is, the closest state which is product at least along a bipartite cut [13].…”
Section: Genuine Multipartite Correlationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As in the case of entanglement [3], the extension to the multipartite scenario is not trivial. A series of postulates any good measure of multipartite correlations should obey was given by Bennett et al [11]. Three main generalizations of quantum discord to the multipartite case have been proposed: Rulli and Sarandy introduced the so-called global discord (GD) which is a natural extension of a symmetrized version of the QD and is based on a collective measurement [12], Modi and co-workers proposed a unified view of correlations that applies in both the bipartite and the multipartite scenarios based on the use of the relative entropy to quantify the 'distance' between states [13], and in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might expect that genuinely n-partite entanglement gives rise to non-vanishing correlations between all n subsystems. This is incorrect, at least when correlations are quantified as average values of a product of local measurement results [3,4] (for a discussion on quantum correlations without classical correlations, see e.g. [5]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the crucial obstacle for further development is the absence of the unified understanding of the multipartite entanglement [18,19]. Whereas the maximally entangled state can be defined unambiguously for bipartite systems, what is the maximally entangled state for multipartite systems is unclear until now [19]. Fortunately it is well accepted that the fully separable state can be defined as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection of multipartite entanglement and quantum phase transition has been discussed in some special models [14][15][16][17]. However the crucial obstacle for further development is the absence of the unified understanding of the multipartite entanglement [18,19]. Whereas the maximally entangled state can be defined unambiguously for bipartite systems, what is the maximally entangled state for multipartite systems is unclear until now [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%