2001
DOI: 10.1172/jci12837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttraumatic therapeutic vaccination with modified myelin self-antigen prevents complete paralysis while avoiding autoimmune disease

Abstract: Spinal cord injury results in a massive loss of neurons, and thus of function. We recently reported that passive transfer of autoimmune T cells directed against myelin-associated antigens provides acutely damaged spinal cords with effective neuroprotection. The therapeutic time window for the passive transfer of T cells was found to be at least 1 week. Here we show that posttraumatic T cell-based active vaccination is also neuroprotective. Immunization with myelin-associated antigens such as myelin basic prote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Schwartz et al have reported that passive administration of T lymphocytes specific to self antigens, at selected times, could promote the recovery from both post partial optic nerve crush injury [29] and post incomplete spinal cord injury [30] in rodents, supporting the concept of protective autoimmunity. Whether the observed CD4 + T lymphocytes in the spinal cord post L5Tx respond to specific CNS antigen(s) and whether this possible T cell specificity plays a role in maintaining behavioral hypersensitivity requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Schwartz et al have reported that passive administration of T lymphocytes specific to self antigens, at selected times, could promote the recovery from both post partial optic nerve crush injury [29] and post incomplete spinal cord injury [30] in rodents, supporting the concept of protective autoimmunity. Whether the observed CD4 + T lymphocytes in the spinal cord post L5Tx respond to specific CNS antigen(s) and whether this possible T cell specificity plays a role in maintaining behavioral hypersensitivity requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals differ in their ability to spontaneously evoke such an immune response (13). However, all individuals can benefit from boosting of the response, provided that intervention occurs at the right time, and uses the right antigen in optimal formulation so that the anti-self response is intensified, yet does not increase the risk of autoimmune disease (12,17,33). We further demonstrated that the same T cells (T helper 1) could apparently be responsible both for autoimmune disease and for protection from the detrimental effects of destructive self-compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, T helper 1 cells directed against immunodominant proteins were shown to be capable of inducing autoimmune disease, as well as neuroprotection (34). Disease-free protection was achieved by inducing an immune response against cryptic epitopes residing within the same potentially pathogenic immune-abundant protein, or by using an altered pathogenic peptide to eliminate the potential pathogenicity of the peptide (17,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, boosting the immune responses to CNS injury under certain conditions may be more beneficial than harmful to functional regeneration (58) . Implantation of activated macrophages (86) or T-lymphocyte mediated immune activity, achieved by either adoptive transfer or active immunization (87)(88)(89)(90) , enhances recovery from spinal cord injury by conferring neuroprotection or regeneration. Although the concept of neuroprotective autoimmunity is intriguing, there is no definitive mechanism that explains its efficacy.…”
Section: Therapeutic Vaccination: Good or Bad?mentioning
confidence: 99%