2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of stimulation led to suboptimal choices of the implant location and stimulation protocols affecting size and consistency of the observed effects. DBS of the VIM/VOP facilitated M1 DCS MEPs in the upper extremity muscles via the CST and enhanced grip forces, which suggests that this therapy could be effective in restoring motor functions by addressing two of the main symptoms after damage to the CST: muscle weakness and loss of strength 9,59 . Indeed, our method availed a fully implanted TBI patient to volitionally modulate grip force, demonstrating that continuous DBS improves fine motor control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of stimulation led to suboptimal choices of the implant location and stimulation protocols affecting size and consistency of the observed effects. DBS of the VIM/VOP facilitated M1 DCS MEPs in the upper extremity muscles via the CST and enhanced grip forces, which suggests that this therapy could be effective in restoring motor functions by addressing two of the main symptoms after damage to the CST: muscle weakness and loss of strength 9,59 . Indeed, our method availed a fully implanted TBI patient to volitionally modulate grip force, demonstrating that continuous DBS improves fine motor control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…DBS of the VIM/VOP facilitated M1 DCS MEPs in the upper extremity muscles via the CST and enhanced grip forces, which suggests that this therapy could be effective in restoring motor functions by addressing two of the main symptoms after damage to the CST: muscle weakness and loss of strength 9,59 . Indeed, our method availed a fully implanted TBI patient to volitionally modulate grip force, demonstrating that continuous DBS improves ne motor control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similar considerations could apply to motor thalamus DBS. Finally, the therapeutic effects of VIM/VOP-DBS might be more clinically relevant when compared to non-invasive cortical stimulation because of the higher selectivity 14,15 and continuous nature 59 of DBS, akin to DBS therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease and Essential Tremor. In fact, non-invasive systems cannot be implanted and consequently be utilized all day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 All told, scES remains an incredibly promising restorative technique for individuals with SCI. Indeed, a case has been made for cervical cord stimulation for upper limb paresis in chronic stroke 34 and initial results are exciting. 35 Further research investigating the potential mechanism of action in more detail, as well as optimizing stimulation protocols is required, not to mention an exploration of the role of scES in other forms of neurological injury and disease.…”
Section: Invasive Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%