2006
DOI: 10.17161/foec.v39i4.6873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postsecondary Settings and Transition Services for Students with Intellectual Disabilities: Models and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems clear that students who have received modified academic programs at the high school level are choosing to enter postsecondary education and yet may not be able to participate equally due to intellectual limitations. In line with research regarding postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities (e.g., Neubert & Moon, 2006;Neubert et al, 2001), continued development of specialized CICE programs at the postsecondary level may allow for such students to participate meaningfully in postsecondary education, and the results from this survey suggest that they may have a better chance of succeeding if enrolled in such a specialized program. Postsecondary institutions may need to investigate how they could deliver such programs to attract and retain a broader range of students, so as to allow students with lower intellectual potential the ability to participate in a postsecondary environment while also increasing their skills and knowledge base.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It seems clear that students who have received modified academic programs at the high school level are choosing to enter postsecondary education and yet may not be able to participate equally due to intellectual limitations. In line with research regarding postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities (e.g., Neubert & Moon, 2006;Neubert et al, 2001), continued development of specialized CICE programs at the postsecondary level may allow for such students to participate meaningfully in postsecondary education, and the results from this survey suggest that they may have a better chance of succeeding if enrolled in such a specialized program. Postsecondary institutions may need to investigate how they could deliver such programs to attract and retain a broader range of students, so as to allow students with lower intellectual potential the ability to participate in a postsecondary environment while also increasing their skills and knowledge base.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The number of postsecondary educational options for students with intellectual disabilities has proliferated in recent years, with over 200 programs now extant (Grigal, Hart, & Weir, ), as has the interest from students and families in accessing these options (e.g., Getzel & Wehman, ; Grigal & Neubert, ; Hart, Grigal, Sax, Martinez, & Will, ). The postsecondary education programs that support students with intellectual disabilities have been classified in three broad categories that include substantially separate or segregated models, mixed or hybrid models, and inclusive or individualized models (e.g., Hart et al., ; Hart, Mele‐McCarthy, Pasternack, Zimbrich, & Parker, ; Neubert & Moon, ; Stodden & Whelley, ). These various models differ with respect to the level of interaction that students with intellectual disabilities have with students without disabilities in academic, social, and residential aspects of college.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although college-based programs have existed for some time (Neubert & Moon, 2006), the notion that young adults with ID could benefit in the same ways as their peers without disabilities is a new one. The CCS program has been something of a laboratory for determining whether and how such an approach could succeed.…”
Section: May 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%