Despite substantial efforts across postsecondary education to increase minority participation in study abroad, the homogeneity of study abroad participants remains largely unchanged (Dessoff in Int Educ 15(2):20-27, 2006; Shih in http://diverseeducation.com/ article/13193/study-abroad-participation-up-except-among-minority-students.html, 2009). This study applies an adaptation of an integrated student choice model (Perna in Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 2006; Salisbury et al. in Research in Higher Education 50: 2009) to identify differences between white and minority (AfricanAmerican, Hispanic, and Asian-American) students across measures of human, financial, social, and cultural capital previously shown to influence aspirations to study abroad (Salisbury et al.). Analysis of data from 6,828 students at 53 institutions participating in the Wabash National Study on Liberal Arts Education suggests numerous differences between racial groups with considerable implications for institutions, scholars, and policymakers.
Keywords Study abroad Á Minority students Á Student choice constructDuring the previous decade, study abroad participation has enjoyed substantial growthrising from 129,770 in 1998/99 to 262,416 in 2007/08-as college students, administrators, and postsecondary policymakers have increasingly recognized the fundamental importance of international understanding and cross-cultural communication skills in the new global economy (Friedman 2005;Green and 2008; IIE 2009;Lincoln Commission 2005). This belief is supported by extensive research on study abroad that suggests numerous benefits for participants across a host of cognitive, affective, and interpersonal dimensions (