The human evolutionary sciences place high value on quantitative data from traditional small-scale societies that are rapidly modernizing. These data often stem from the sustained ethnographic work of anthropologists who are today nearing the end of their careers. Yet many quantitative ethnographic data are preserved only in summary formats that do not reflect the rich and variable ethnographic reality often described in unpublished field notes, nor the deep knowledge of their collectors. In raw disaggregated formats, such data have tremendous scientific value when used in conjunction with modern statistical techniques and as part of comparative analyses.Through a personal example of longitudinal research with Batek hunter-gatherers that involved collaboration across generations of researchers, we argue that quantifiable ethnographic records, just like material artifacts, deserve high-priority preservation efforts. We discuss the benefits, challenges, and possible avenues forward for digitizing, preserving, and archiving ethnographic data before it is too late. K E Y W O R D S archival, Batek, ethnography, quantitative anthropology, reproducibility 1 | INTRODUCTION As young graduate students of evolutionary anthropology at Dartmouth College, we (T.S.K. and V.V.V.) first approached Dr. K.M.E. in the spring of 2012 with questions about his ethnographic research with Batek hunter-gatherers in Peninsular Malaysia. At the time, we were preoccupied with questions about human locomotion in rainforest environments, particularly those surrounding tree climbing and arboreal behavior, and had read Dr. Endicott's vivid descriptions of extraordinary arboreal feats by Batek foragers in pursuit of honey and fruit (Endicott & Endicott 2008). We knew that K.M.E. and his wife, anthropologist K.L.E., had spent long periods of time in the field with the Batek (Figure 1). From 1971 to 2004, they conducted studies on Batek religion, gender relations, social organization, economy, development, and land rights. [1][2][3][4] The research questions addressed by the Endicotts were qualitative in nature, but we noticed that in their book, "The Headman was a Woman", 3 foraging return data were presented in tabular form.One day, we asked K.M.E. about the source data underlying the foraging statistics, and to our surprise, he brought out boxes containing stacks of yellowed field notes. The materials spanned 4 decades and revealed a cornucopia of quantifiable data on topics ranging from daily foraging returns to sharing networks, kin relations, coresidence patterns, and nomadic movements, all bolstered by meticulous daily field notes ( Figure 2). This information was documented in various forms: raw field notes in shorthand, summaries of daily field notes, and hierarchical data coded neatly in spreadsheets complete with metadata. During their training, the Endicotts were advised that, regardless of one's research question or anthropological orientation, collecting basic quantitative data on economy, kinship, and social organization lends crucia...