2010
DOI: 10.1577/m09-161.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postrelease Performance of Acclimated and Directly Released Hatchery Summer Steelhead into Oregon Tributaries of the Snake River

Abstract: In a study using 14 paired‐release groups over 10 release years, we compared the performance of hatchery summer steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss that were acclimated as smolts (AC) for 16–57 d before release into ponds supplied with ambient stream water with that of fish trucked from the hatchery and directly released (DR) into Spring, Deer, and Little Sheep creeks in northeastern Oregon. After releasing the fish into streams, we monitored out‐migration travel times and survival to Lower Granite Dam (LGD) on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these results suggest that longer odor exposure periods may facilitate successful imprinting and that acclimation for a period of time prior to release may improve homing fidelity. However, previous studies on the importance of acclimation timing for successful imprinting in steelhead and Chinook Salmon have produced mixed results, suggesting that homing site fidelity may improve with acclimation (e.g., Clarke et al 2010) or have no effect (e.g., Kenaston et al 2001;Clarke et al 2016).…”
Section: Duration Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together, these results suggest that longer odor exposure periods may facilitate successful imprinting and that acclimation for a period of time prior to release may improve homing fidelity. However, previous studies on the importance of acclimation timing for successful imprinting in steelhead and Chinook Salmon have produced mixed results, suggesting that homing site fidelity may improve with acclimation (e.g., Clarke et al 2010) or have no effect (e.g., Kenaston et al 2001;Clarke et al 2016).…”
Section: Duration Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many studies of salmon released into natural river systems suggest that relatively short exposure time is sufficient for fish to learn site-specific olfactory cues that they can utilize for successful homing. For example, Coho Salmon held as smolts for 36-48 h in spring water prior to release homed accurately to this water source as adults (Jensen and Duncan 1971), and Snake River Sockeye Salmon and steelhead smolts released directly into tributaries migrated quickly downstream but most successfully imprinted and homed to their release site (Hebdon et al 2004;Clarke et al 2010). Together, these results suggest that longer odor exposure periods may facilitate successful imprinting and that acclimation for a period of time prior to release may improve homing fidelity.…”
Section: Duration Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet in our study the seemingly poor imprinting and high stray rates occurred across all treatment groups, which provide evidence that high density rearing did not contribute to the problem. Acclimation also apparently did not improve imprinting and reduce straying as it has in other studies (Garcia et al 2004;Clarke et al 2010), although our study did not include a direct stream release group necessary to definitively reach such a conclusion. Thus, we speculate that the high straying rates were most likely due to a mismatched timing between when fish were physiologically prepared for imprinting and when they were exposed to Umatilla River water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Biologists and statisticians have frequently used the Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) mark–recapture model to estimate joint apparent survival and detection probabilities for Pacific salmon during their migration through the hydroelectric dams of the FCRPS (e.g., Burnham et al 1987; Skalski et al 1998; Zabel et al 2005; Clarke et al 2010). A fundamental assumption for mark–recapture models like the CJS is that the tags or marks are not lost (Burnham et al 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%