2020
DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postrace Dry Needling Does Not Reduce Subsequent Soreness and Cramping—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Objective: To identify whether a single session of postrace dry needling can decrease postrace soreness and quantity of postrace leg cramps in half-marathon and full-marathon runners. Design: Single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Finish line of 2018 Salt Lake City Marathon & Half-Marathon. Participants: Runners aged 18 years or old… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of the studies can be considered good according to the PEDro scale, ranging from 5 to 9 with a mean score of 6.41. Albin et al [ 34 ] obtained the highest score (9 points) and Bandy et al [ 35 ], Baraja-Vegas et al [ 36 ], Pérez-Bellmunt et al [ 45 ], Janowski et al [ 43 ], and Cushman et al [ 40 ] the lowest (5 points). Detailed information is shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The methodological quality of the studies can be considered good according to the PEDro scale, ranging from 5 to 9 with a mean score of 6.41. Albin et al [ 34 ] obtained the highest score (9 points) and Bandy et al [ 35 ], Baraja-Vegas et al [ 36 ], Pérez-Bellmunt et al [ 45 ], Janowski et al [ 43 ], and Cushman et al [ 40 ] the lowest (5 points). Detailed information is shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the risk of bias according to the ROB 2.0, Albin et al [ 34 ] obtained the lowest risk, while Cushman et al [ 40 ] obtained the highest ( Figure 2 ). The domains with the lowest risk were missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, and selection of the reported result ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations