2016
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative radiotherapy in the management of keloids

Abstract: BackgroundThe high recurrence rate following keloid resection has generated interest in adjuvant treatments for this disease.ObjectiveThis study assesses keloid recurrence when treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.MethodsRetrospective analysis of resected keloids in patients referred to a Chilean radiation oncology centre between 2006 and 2013. Local recurrence was defined as new tissue growth on the surgical scar margin.ResultsAround103 keloids were analysed in 63 patients treated with 15 Gy in thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of the follow-up for 23 subjects was <32 weeks. Previous studies have found that 50-94% of pathological scars recurred after 1 year of treatment (81,82). Nonetheless, long-term follow-up can be difficult because most patients lose interest in follow-up after achieving satisfactory treatment results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the follow-up for 23 subjects was <32 weeks. Previous studies have found that 50-94% of pathological scars recurred after 1 year of treatment (81,82). Nonetheless, long-term follow-up can be difficult because most patients lose interest in follow-up after achieving satisfactory treatment results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several trials with electron beam radiation therapy, the definition of keloid recurrence was not specified [ 23–26 ]. One study defined recurrence as new tissue growth on the surgical scar margin [ 27 ], while another study based treatment success on each patient’s self-assessment at 18 months post-treatment as follows: Very satisfied, no recurrence, no symptoms; Satisfied, ≤50% recurrence without symptoms; and Unsatisfied, >50% recurrence with symptoms [ 28 ] ( Table 1 ). One study classified response to treatment into four groups: Good, no visible scar or small scar in the plane of the skin, no complaints and no recurrence during follow-up; Improved, no itching or other complaints, visible scar partly elevated by no more than 1 mm above the plane of the skin, slight dehiscence and no recurrence during follow-up; Invalid, scar remained and was accompanied by swelling and itching symptoms after treatment and within 3 months; and Relapse, treatment was effective for 3 months but scar became elevated above the plane of the skin, or scar dehiscence and itching and erythema symptoms appeared again after 3 months.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%