2018
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative pulmonary complications and thoracic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors therefore advocate for the use of VCV, an appropriate level of PEEP and low driving pressures to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications . Their methods, results and conclusions have attracted much attention and we believe several aspects of their study warrant further discussion. Although there is good evidence supporting the theory that intra‐operative high tidal volumes, high driving pressures and low or no PEEP increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications , there is no clinical evidence or biological rationale as to why PCV alone should be any riskier than VCV .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors therefore advocate for the use of VCV, an appropriate level of PEEP and low driving pressures to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications . Their methods, results and conclusions have attracted much attention and we believe several aspects of their study warrant further discussion. Although there is good evidence supporting the theory that intra‐operative high tidal volumes, high driving pressures and low or no PEEP increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications , there is no clinical evidence or biological rationale as to why PCV alone should be any riskier than VCV .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%