2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Pain Management Using Supplemental Bupivacaine After Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent randomized controlled clinical trial showed that postoperative bupivacaine use did not show superior analgesic efficacy when compared with normal saline in controlling acute POP after bilateral SSRO [ 24 ]. The duration of action for 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride is approximately 6 h [ 25 ], and the elimination half-life for bupivacaine hydrochloride hydrate is also approximately 6 h [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent randomized controlled clinical trial showed that postoperative bupivacaine use did not show superior analgesic efficacy when compared with normal saline in controlling acute POP after bilateral SSRO [ 24 ]. The duration of action for 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride is approximately 6 h [ 25 ], and the elimination half-life for bupivacaine hydrochloride hydrate is also approximately 6 h [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following orthognathic surgery, NSAIDs are the most commonly prescribed medication for postoperative pain medications [17]; however, the lack of evidence regarding pain management in oral and maxillofacial surgery results in wide variations in analgesic practice. [18,20,20] Of importance, a consensus has emerged in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy regarding diclofenac, noting it has the potential for higher rates of cardiovascular side effects. [24] The European Medical Agency has released two Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) recommendations on diclofenac (2013) and ibuprofen ( 2016) to increase awareness of potential cardio-or cerebrovascular side effects while still confirming that both drugs are valuable analgesics in the appropriate patients [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the authors found no adverse events from metamizole. [18,20,21,22,23] A review and position paper by the working group for Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy of the European Society of Cardiology, the number needed to harm for diclofenac, because of a serious cardiovascular events, was 25. [25] For example, a low NNH indicates that one is more likely to encounter the harm than the benefit, as a serious adverse event is encountered after treating just 25 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%