1996
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Nasogastric Decompression: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One9 was a follow‐up report with a new outcome (ventral hernia) from a group of patients reported previously7. A broad range of abdominal surgery was covered in these papers; there were seven on colorectal surgery3, 7, 10–14, seven on gastroduodenal surgery2, 15–20, two each on biliary21, 22 and gynaecological23, 24 surgery, one each on vascular25 and emergency trauma26 surgery, and seven that included all facets of abdominal surgery1, 4, 6, 27–30. The included publications described 4195 participants, 2108 randomized to prophylactic nasogastric tube insertion for postoperative decompression, and 2087 randomized to no tube in the postoperative period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One9 was a follow‐up report with a new outcome (ventral hernia) from a group of patients reported previously7. A broad range of abdominal surgery was covered in these papers; there were seven on colorectal surgery3, 7, 10–14, seven on gastroduodenal surgery2, 15–20, two each on biliary21, 22 and gynaecological23, 24 surgery, one each on vascular25 and emergency trauma26 surgery, and seven that included all facets of abdominal surgery1, 4, 6, 27–30. The included publications described 4195 participants, 2108 randomized to prophylactic nasogastric tube insertion for postoperative decompression, and 2087 randomized to no tube in the postoperative period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such a short‐term intervention in patients confined to hospital, drop‐outs should have been rare. Only four studies reported a drop‐out rate that was greater than 10 per cent1, 2, 15, 19. Inclusion criteria were poorly specified or absent in several papers6, 17, 18 and comparability of the two participant groups was difficult to assess in several3, 6, 15, 17, 28.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treatment is useful in decreasing abdominal distension, relieving nausea and vomiting, while serving as a marker for gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In the past century, it was widely accepted as routine for abdominal operations [10]. However, controversies regarding the necessity of such intervention for all abdominal operations, especially in the lower digestive tract, have arisen [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trotz Berichten über eine gesteigerte Aspirationsgefahr [18] sehen verschiedenste Autoren die Verwendung von Magensonden als "Therapiestandard" [19] oder "übliche Praxis" [18] an. In einer 1995 publizierten Metaanalyse kamen die Autoren zu dem Schluss, dass die Verwendung von Magensonden lediglich die Wahrscheinlichkeit des postoperativen Erbrechens reduziert.…”
Section: Magensonden In Der Abdominalchirurgieunclassified