1966
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Postoperative Infection With Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in an Eye Hospital
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
58
2
2
0
Citation Types
0
10
0
0
Year Published
Range
1966
19662020
2020Publication Types
Select...
49
12
Relationship
0
61
Authors
Journals
Cited by 61 publications
(10 citation statements)
References 13 publications
0
10
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But after intraocular operations, sepsis is nearly always very serious; in almost every case there is a real possibility that the eye will be lost. Thus, in a series of 22 infections (Allen & Mangiaracine 1964), evisceration of the eye was necessary in 11 and useful vision was lost in a further 7; in the Birmingham outbreak 15 infections led to the loss of 6 eyes (Ayliffe et al 1966).…”
Section: Results and Incidence Ofpost-operative Sepsis
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But after intraocular operations, sepsis is nearly always very serious; in almost every case there is a real possibility that the eye will be lost. Thus, in a series of 22 infections (Allen & Mangiaracine 1964), evisceration of the eye was necessary in 11 and useful vision was lost in a further 7; in the Birmingham outbreak 15 infections led to the loss of 6 eyes (Ayliffe et al 1966).…”
Section: Results and Incidence Ofpost-operative Sepsis
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Several phenotypical methods have been employed in previous studies to identify similarities between bacterial infections, including antimicrobial susceptibility profiles 12,13 or phage, pyocin, and serological typing. 11 Cruciani et al were the first to use genotyping (pulsefield gel electrophoresis) as a means of correlating samples of three strains of P. aeruginosa taken from (1) patients with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery who had been operated on during different days and (2) phacoemulsifier internal tubing. 6 Previous pulsed-field gel electrophoresis tests for Alcaligenes used XbaI, SpeI, or DraI as restriction endonucleases.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports of clustered endophthalmitis outbreaks following cataract surgery have been published, including series of patients who were operated on during the same day and infected by different bacteria 4 and series of patients operated on during different days and infected by the same bacteria. 6 The most frequently cited bacterium in these studies has been P. aeruginosa, 3,4,6,7,[11][12][13]15 but other bacteria such as Staphylococcus, 4 Acremonium kiliense, 8 and Empedobacter brevis 5 are regularly incriminated. To date, our series is the first to report an endophthalmitis series involving Alcaligenes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Conflicting views have been presented regarding the frequency and importance of microbial contamination of eye drops. Thus bacterial growth from eye drop containers and the occurrence of serious ocular infections following the use of contaminated solutions have been reported by among others Allen & Mangiaracine (1964), Ayliffe et al (1966), Harte et al (1978), McCulloch (1943), Schmelzer Hervding Contamination of in-use eye drops (1965) and Vaughn (1955). On the other hand, some studies show only a negligible incidence of bacterial growth (Barkman et al 1969;Hugo & Wilson 1970;h u n d et al 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But after intraocular operations, sepsis is nearly always very serious; in almost every case there is a real possibility that the eye will be lost. Thus, in a series of 22 infections (Allen & Mangiaracine 1964), evisceration of the eye was necessary in 11 and useful vision was lost in a further 7; in the Birmingham outbreak 15 infections led to the loss of 6 eyes (Ayliffe et al 1966).…”
Section: Results and Incidence Ofpost-operative Sepsis
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Several phenotypical methods have been employed in previous studies to identify similarities between bacterial infections, including antimicrobial susceptibility profiles 12,13 or phage, pyocin, and serological typing. 11 Cruciani et al were the first to use genotyping (pulsefield gel electrophoresis) as a means of correlating samples of three strains of P. aeruginosa taken from (1) patients with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery who had been operated on during different days and (2) phacoemulsifier internal tubing. 6 Previous pulsed-field gel electrophoresis tests for Alcaligenes used XbaI, SpeI, or DraI as restriction endonucleases.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports of clustered endophthalmitis outbreaks following cataract surgery have been published, including series of patients who were operated on during the same day and infected by different bacteria 4 and series of patients operated on during different days and infected by the same bacteria. 6 The most frequently cited bacterium in these studies has been P. aeruginosa, 3,4,6,7,[11][12][13]15 but other bacteria such as Staphylococcus, 4 Acremonium kiliense, 8 and Empedobacter brevis 5 are regularly incriminated. To date, our series is the first to report an endophthalmitis series involving Alcaligenes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Conflicting views have been presented regarding the frequency and importance of microbial contamination of eye drops. Thus bacterial growth from eye drop containers and the occurrence of serious ocular infections following the use of contaminated solutions have been reported by among others Allen & Mangiaracine (1964), Ayliffe et al (1966), Harte et al (1978), McCulloch (1943), Schmelzer Hervding Contamination of in-use eye drops (1965) and Vaughn (1955). On the other hand, some studies show only a negligible incidence of bacterial growth (Barkman et al 1969;Hugo & Wilson 1970;h u n d et al 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But after intraocular operations, sepsis is nearly always very serious; in almost every case there is a real possibility that the eye will be lost. Thus, in a series of 22 infections (Allen & Mangiaracine 1964), evisceration of the eye was necessary in 11 and useful vision was lost in a further 7; in the Birmingham outbreak 15 infections led to the loss of 6 eyes (Ayliffe et al 1966).…”
Section: Results and Incidence Ofpost-operative Sepsis
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Several phenotypical methods have been employed in previous studies to identify similarities between bacterial infections, including antimicrobial susceptibility profiles 12,13 or phage, pyocin, and serological typing. 11 Cruciani et al were the first to use genotyping (pulsefield gel electrophoresis) as a means of correlating samples of three strains of P. aeruginosa taken from (1) patients with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery who had been operated on during different days and (2) phacoemulsifier internal tubing. 6 Previous pulsed-field gel electrophoresis tests for Alcaligenes used XbaI, SpeI, or DraI as restriction endonucleases.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports of clustered endophthalmitis outbreaks following cataract surgery have been published, including series of patients who were operated on during the same day and infected by different bacteria 4 and series of patients operated on during different days and infected by the same bacteria. 6 The most frequently cited bacterium in these studies has been P. aeruginosa, 3,4,6,7,[11][12][13]15 but other bacteria such as Staphylococcus, 4 Acremonium kiliense, 8 and Empedobacter brevis 5 are regularly incriminated. To date, our series is the first to report an endophthalmitis series involving Alcaligenes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Conflicting views have been presented regarding the frequency and importance of microbial contamination of eye drops. Thus bacterial growth from eye drop containers and the occurrence of serious ocular infections following the use of contaminated solutions have been reported by among others Allen & Mangiaracine (1964), Ayliffe et al (1966), Harte et al (1978), McCulloch (1943), Schmelzer Hervding Contamination of in-use eye drops (1965) and Vaughn (1955). On the other hand, some studies show only a negligible incidence of bacterial growth (Barkman et al 1969;Hugo & Wilson 1970;h u n d et al 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%