Postoperative Functional and Cosmetic Satisfaction among Subjects Undergoing Open Versus Endonasal Septorhinoplasty: Five Years’ Experience from an Open-label Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Oman

Abri, Rashid Al; Bassam, Wameedh Al; Al-Balushi, F.; Hlaiwah, Omar; Jaju, Sanjay; Al-Adawi, Samir

doi:10.5001/omj.2020.38

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patient satisfaction was reported to be >90% in all 3 methods and there was no significant difference between them 6 . Similarly, in another recent study which evaluated satisfaction in respect of open and endonasal septorhinoplasty techniques, no difference was reported in respect of patient satisfaction 20 . When the current study results were evaluated in respect of satisfaction, patients were satisfied with both techniques and no difference was determined between the groups in respect of patient satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

“…6 Similarly, in another recent study which evaluated satisfaction in respect of open and endonasal septorhinoplasty techniques, no difference was reported in respect of patient satisfaction. 20 When the current study results were evaluated in respect of satisfaction, patients were satisfied with both techniques and no difference was determined between the groups in respect of patient satisfaction. Consistent with previous findings in literature, no relationship was determined in the current study between patient satisfaction and method (r:0.002, P ¼ 0.965).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect on Patient Satisfaction of the Postoperative Nasal Topographic, Demographic, and Functional Results of Open and Closed Septorhinoplasty Techniques

Metín

Avcu

2020

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate the contribution to patient satisfaction of the newly reshaped topographic anatomy of the nose, demographic, and functional results in the postoperative period of septorhinoplasty surgery. Method: A total of 370 patients applied with open and closed septorhinoplasty techniques for various reasons were grouped according to the postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Scale results; Group 1 (open rhinoplasty satisfied group, ROE !12 points, n:194), Group 2 (open rhinoplasty dissatisfied group, ROE <12 points, n:23), Group 3 (closed rhinoplasty satisfied group, ROE !12 points, n:137), Group 4 (closed rhinoplasty dissatisfied group, ROE <12 points, n:16). The groups were evaluated in respect of the effect on patient satisfaction of functional and demographic variables and satisfaction with the topographic outcome of the nose. Results: The effect of the topographic surgical results was evaluated on patient satisfaction. A correlation was determined between nasal topographic satisfaction and patient satisfaction (r:0.228, P ¼ 0.009). In the subgroup analyses, the only factor among the topographic factors which had an effect on satisfaction was the nasal tip (r:0.187, P ¼ 0.024). Although 30.7% (n:39) of patients dissatisfied with the surgery reported that they were not satisfied with the nasal base results, no correlation was determined between nasal base and satisfaction (r:0.091, P ¼ 0.463). The strongest correlations of patient satisfaction were determined to be with subjective (NOSE score [r:0.530, P < 0.001]) and objective (high nasal resistance levels [r:0.579, P < 0.001]) functional results. Conclusion:The 2 basic components of postoperative satisfaction with SRP surgery were shown to be functional healing and cosmetic outcomes. Of the surgical topographic results, nasal tip and nasal base were the parts determined to require the most attention.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

The Effect on Patient Satisfaction of the Postoperative Nasal Topographic, Demographic, and Functional Results of Open and Closed Septorhinoplasty Techniques

Metín

Avcu

2020

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Safe and careful surgical approaches to the treatment areas are the next step in achieving a successful result and is also much debated. [22][23][24] Executing the surgical plan in the setting of a biological system is another challenge. Patient comorbidities, 25 prior injuries, anatomic variations, 26 and the surgeon's experience level 27 all affect the success or failure during the intraoperative phase.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Need for Innovation in Rhinoplasty

Winkler

Chabuz

McIntosh³

et al. 2022

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rhinoplasty is a challenging surgery and results are not always perfect. There are many obstacles to achieving optimal results. Among these are inadequate instrumentation, the unpredictability of healing, imprecise planning, and many more. Furthermore, selecting patients who can most benefit from surgery is equally important. In this article, some of the more pressing areas of rhinoplasty that need innovation are discussed. From proper patient selection, to advances in education, to the standardization of training programs, to the development of sophisticated implants, the future of rhinoplasty surgery lies in continued creativity and innovation.

show abstract