2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative fractures of the lingual plate after bilateral sagittal split osteotomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications associated with the surgical technique when performing the sagittal split osteotomy are well documented in the literature, some of the most common being unfavourable fractures of either the distal or proximal segment, damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, failure of fixation and condylar sag. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Although the anatomy of the posterior part of the mandible lends itself to the surgical design, it has become evident that the specific anatomy of each individual mandibular ramus differs which may play a significant role in the ease of splitting the ramus. Various technical factors could influence the successful completion of the split and there are several important anatomical structures that should be considered when the split is performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complications associated with the surgical technique when performing the sagittal split osteotomy are well documented in the literature, some of the most common being unfavourable fractures of either the distal or proximal segment, damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, failure of fixation and condylar sag. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Although the anatomy of the posterior part of the mandible lends itself to the surgical design, it has become evident that the specific anatomy of each individual mandibular ramus differs which may play a significant role in the ease of splitting the ramus. Various technical factors could influence the successful completion of the split and there are several important anatomical structures that should be considered when the split is performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various technical factors could influence the successful completion of the split and there are several important anatomical structures that should be considered when the split is performed. 12 Maintaining the mandibular condyle/fossa relationship forms the basis for the achievement of the new planned occlusion. Correct positioning of the condyles in the fossae during surgery is therefore mandatory and is certainly challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results demonstrated that significant risk factors for splits included a vertical mandibular height of 2 cm or less distal to the last molar tooth, a depth of 0.6 cm or less from the apex of the last molar root, or an impacted third molar to the lower border. 13 Falter et al declared that even if precautions are taken, a bad split may occur during SSO of the mandible. They found this complication to have a low incidence (0.7% of all SSOs) and healing to be uneventful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Surgeons make an osteotomy at various sites and of various lengths on the medial and lateral aspects of the mandible. 2 Since its introduction, many modifications of the original technique have been described in an attempt to decrease the risk of bad splits, to avoid non-union, and to prevent trauma to the inferior alveolar nerve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible is a versatile and reliable operation-used to advance or set back the mandible [1]. This could be the procedure which defined the evolution of the specialty of oral surgery, the art, to the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery, the science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%