2022
DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Complications and Survival Rate in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery

Abstract: Introduction Spine surgery is challenging in hemodialysis (HD)-dependent patients owing to their poor general condition. However, postoperative complications and the mortality and survival rates have not been specifically evaluated in a wide series. This study aimed to elucidate postoperative complications and the survival rate in cervical spine surgery in HD patients. Methods This study included 109 HD patients (70 men, 39 women) who had undergone cervical spine surger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of confounding factors (e.g., sex, age and duration of symptoms) was mostly adequate, except in six studies that appeared to miss key confounders ( 47 , 52 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 ), most commonly due to lack of complete exclusion criteria, and two studies that appeared to be missing most confounders ( 32 , 49 ). Strategies to deal with confounders was performed to a lower quality, with 13 studies deemed unclear ( 38 , 39 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 73 , 77 , 79 ), and four studies deemed inadequate ( 32 , 47 , 48 , 56 ), most commonly due to a lack of a multivariate regression analysis. The cohorts were deemed either free of the outcome at the start of all studies or this criteria was not applicable, if for example the outcome was improvement in neurological status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification of confounding factors (e.g., sex, age and duration of symptoms) was mostly adequate, except in six studies that appeared to miss key confounders ( 47 , 52 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 ), most commonly due to lack of complete exclusion criteria, and two studies that appeared to be missing most confounders ( 32 , 49 ). Strategies to deal with confounders was performed to a lower quality, with 13 studies deemed unclear ( 38 , 39 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 73 , 77 , 79 ), and four studies deemed inadequate ( 32 , 47 , 48 , 56 ), most commonly due to a lack of a multivariate regression analysis. The cohorts were deemed either free of the outcome at the start of all studies or this criteria was not applicable, if for example the outcome was improvement in neurological status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes were measured in a valid and reliable manner in most studies, except one ( 49 ), where the methods section was sparse. The follow-up time was mostly adequate in length and reporting, except in nine studies ( 34 , 44 , 47 , 49 , 55 , 58 , 61 , 73 , 86 ), often due to incomplete reporting. Follow-up was mostly adequate, often owing to the retrospective nature of a significant portion of included studies, or if there was substantial loss to follow-up, this was usually reasonably explored, except in two studies ( 46 , 66 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%