“… 2 , 3 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 12 Despite the fact that ART was seen as the preferable treatment in many of the peer review articles, a great deal of studies supported either method by demonstrating that ART and ESRT/SRT shared no statistically significant differences relating to OS. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 To further provide evidence for this point, this review discovered that even when comparing data with other studies, OS rates in ART and ESRT/SRT were almost equivalent. These results were also insufficient in concluding that one method is better than the other, since the evidence was not strong enough to suggest that an effect exists between ART and ESRT/SRT (p = 0.770).…”