2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative accuracy analysis of three-dimensional corrective osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity with a custom-made surgical guide based on computer simulation

Abstract: The 3D correction of cubitus varus deformity was performed accurately within the allowable error limits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [33] obtained satisfactory results using a CAD navigation template on cubitus varus deformity, but this template only corrected the varus deformity. Omori et al [16] designed a surgical navigation template to correct the 3D deformity, but its large size made the surgical incision larger than that of conventional surgery, which was not easily accepted by patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al [33] obtained satisfactory results using a CAD navigation template on cubitus varus deformity, but this template only corrected the varus deformity. Omori et al [16] designed a surgical navigation template to correct the 3D deformity, but its large size made the surgical incision larger than that of conventional surgery, which was not easily accepted by patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment for cubitus varus deformity is now trending toward 3D correction [14], but this technique is challenging for orthopedic surgeons [15][16][17][18]. Accurately controlling the correction angle of each dimension during the operation is difficult, and the degree of correction must often be repeatedly adjusted during surgery or determined based on general appearance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have described the use of the guide as a promising technique. They have demonstrated good clinical outcomes [1925] and high accuracy [2628] in performing corrective osteotomies for upper limb deformities, and have reported its utility for the intra-articular correction of the distal radius [29, 30]. The 1.0-mm expansion of the physeal bar was defined as a target knowing that approximately 0.5 mm is the mean error in creating the models [14], and the diameter of the K-wires mentioned later is 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology has made great headway in designing patient-specific instruments. Once the planning and simulation are done at the backend office, appropriate jigs and cutting tools can be made using rapid prototyping [7,[12][13][14]. Several companies are aggressively developing this technology; and several proprietary devices such as Signature by Biomet and Visionaire by Smith & Nephew are currently available internationally ( Fig.…”
Section: Customized (Patient Specific) Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%