2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00232-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postnatal testing following gestational diabetes: time to replace the oral glucose tolerance test?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the need for postpartum screening in these women. Global data indicates that postpartum screening is between 24% and 58% [51], whereas, in South Africa, less than 30% attend the recommended 6 weeks postpartum OGTT [24]. Several barriers from both the health system and patient perspectives hinder the 6-week postpartum screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the need for postpartum screening in these women. Global data indicates that postpartum screening is between 24% and 58% [51], whereas, in South Africa, less than 30% attend the recommended 6 weeks postpartum OGTT [24]. Several barriers from both the health system and patient perspectives hinder the 6-week postpartum screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…200 Previously, oral glucose tolerance testing was advocated to screen for DM in such patients, but screening by fasting glucose or glycated haemoglobin may be preferable. 201 2.5.3.2 Non-obstetric conditions PCOS affects 5% of all women in their fertile years. PCOS has been associated with an increased risk for future development of CVD, but larger studies have produced conflicting results.…”
Section: Obstetric Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wcześniej u takich pacjentek zalecano doustny test tolerancji glukozy jako badanie przesiewowe w kierunku DM, natomiast obecnie w ramach badań przesiewowych preferuje się pomiar glikemii na czczo lub hemoglobiny glikowanej [201].…”
Section: Stany Położniczeunclassified