Abstract:mary auditory cortex (AI) of adult Pteronotus parnellii features a foveal representation of the second harmonic constant frequency (CF2) echolocation call component. In the corresponding Dopplershifted constant frequency (DSCF) area, the 61 kHz range is overrepresented for extraction of frequency-shift information in CF2 echoes. To assess to which degree AI postnatal maturation depends on active echolocation or/and reflects ongoing cochlear maturation, cortical neurons were recorded in juveniles up to postnata… Show more
“…One explanation for the well-defined set of interactions underlying combination sensitivity is that the system appears to be prewired before the first experience with echolocation. Thus, tuning to pulse-echo delay occurs in the auditory cortex on the first day after birth, and many features of mature responses are evident within the first week (Vater et al, 2010; Kössl et al, 2012). It is not clear whether this tuning precedes combination sensitivity in the IC, but our hypothesis is that the brainstem and midbrain mechanisms and circuitry form during prenatal development.…”
This review describes mechanisms and circuitry underlying combination-sensitive response properties in the auditory brainstem and midbrain. Combination-sensitive neurons, performing a type of auditory spectro-temporal integration, respond to specific, properly timed combinations of spectral elements in vocal signals and other acoustic stimuli. While these neurons are known to occur in the auditory forebrain of many vertebrate species, the work described here establishes their origin in the auditory brainstem and midbrain. Focusing on the mustached bat, we review several major findings: (1) Combination-sensitive responses involve facilitatory interactions, inhibitory interactions, or both when activated by distinct spectral elements in complex sounds. (2) Combination-sensitive responses are created in distinct stages: inhibition arises mainly in lateral lemniscal nuclei of the auditory brainstem, while facilitation arises in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the midbrain. (3) Spectral integration underlying combination-sensitive responses requires a low-frequency input tuned well below a neuron's characteristic frequency (ChF). Low-ChF neurons in the auditory brainstem project to high-ChF regions in brainstem or IC to create combination sensitivity. (4) At their sites of origin, both facilitatory and inhibitory combination-sensitive interactions depend on glycinergic inputs and are eliminated by glycine receptor blockade. Surprisingly, facilitatory interactions in IC depend almost exclusively on glycinergic inputs and are largely independent of glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs. (5) The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB), the lateral lemniscal nuclei, and the IC play critical roles in creating combination-sensitive responses. We propose that these mechanisms, based on work in the mustached bat, apply to a broad range of mammals and other vertebrates that depend on temporally sensitive integration of information across the audible spectrum.
“…One explanation for the well-defined set of interactions underlying combination sensitivity is that the system appears to be prewired before the first experience with echolocation. Thus, tuning to pulse-echo delay occurs in the auditory cortex on the first day after birth, and many features of mature responses are evident within the first week (Vater et al, 2010; Kössl et al, 2012). It is not clear whether this tuning precedes combination sensitivity in the IC, but our hypothesis is that the brainstem and midbrain mechanisms and circuitry form during prenatal development.…”
This review describes mechanisms and circuitry underlying combination-sensitive response properties in the auditory brainstem and midbrain. Combination-sensitive neurons, performing a type of auditory spectro-temporal integration, respond to specific, properly timed combinations of spectral elements in vocal signals and other acoustic stimuli. While these neurons are known to occur in the auditory forebrain of many vertebrate species, the work described here establishes their origin in the auditory brainstem and midbrain. Focusing on the mustached bat, we review several major findings: (1) Combination-sensitive responses involve facilitatory interactions, inhibitory interactions, or both when activated by distinct spectral elements in complex sounds. (2) Combination-sensitive responses are created in distinct stages: inhibition arises mainly in lateral lemniscal nuclei of the auditory brainstem, while facilitation arises in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the midbrain. (3) Spectral integration underlying combination-sensitive responses requires a low-frequency input tuned well below a neuron's characteristic frequency (ChF). Low-ChF neurons in the auditory brainstem project to high-ChF regions in brainstem or IC to create combination sensitivity. (4) At their sites of origin, both facilitatory and inhibitory combination-sensitive interactions depend on glycinergic inputs and are eliminated by glycine receptor blockade. Surprisingly, facilitatory interactions in IC depend almost exclusively on glycinergic inputs and are largely independent of glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs. (5) The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB), the lateral lemniscal nuclei, and the IC play critical roles in creating combination-sensitive responses. We propose that these mechanisms, based on work in the mustached bat, apply to a broad range of mammals and other vertebrates that depend on temporally sensitive integration of information across the audible spectrum.
“…It is conspicuous that at the same developmental stage when delay-sensitive neurons are already functional, frequency tuning in the ventrally located primary AC is still quite immature because of ongoing inner ear development. In addition, other forms of facilitative combination sensitivity, reported for adult primary AC are still absent during the first postnatal week 20 . Therefore, one of the neuronal characteristics most crucial and advanced in terms of echolocation processing seems to appear first and not last in the maturation hierarchy of AC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The age-related increase in sensitivity of involved cortical delay-tuned neurons, however, is most likely not dependent on experience but produced by maturation of the cochlea (PP: ref. 15) as it has been suggested for development of the primary AC of PP 20 . In the ascending auditory system, delay-sensitive neuronal responses are first created at the midbrain level (PP: refs 18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PP cannot be bred in sufficient numbers in captivity and were caught in Cuban caves, experiments in 33 young bats and 13 adults took place at Havana University. Age was determined from forearm length 14,15,20 . Newborns have a forearm length of ~20 mm and the growth rate is ~1 mm per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craniotomy was performed to expose small areas of the left AC. The location of auditory areas was determined from major blood vessels and, in the case of PP, from the Sylvian fissure and from published cortex maps on adults 3,4,37-39 and young bats 20 . After experiments, the animals were killed by Pentobarbital overdose and heads were preserved in 4% paraformaldehyde.…”
neuronal computation of object distance from echo delay is an essential task that echolocating bats must master for spatial orientation and the capture of prey. In the dorsal auditory cortex of bats, neurons specifically respond to combinations of short frequency-modulated components of emitted call and delayed echo. These delay-tuned neurons are thought to serve in target range calculation. It is unknown whether neuronal correlates of active space perception are established by experience-dependent plasticity or by innate mechanisms. Here we demonstrate that in the first postnatal week, before onset of echolocation and flight, dorsal auditory cortex already contains functional circuits that calculate distance from the temporal separation of a simulated pulse and echo. This innate cortical implementation of a purely computational processing mechanism for sonar ranging should enhance survival of juvenile bats when they first engage in active echolocation behaviour and flight.
Studies of birdsongs and neural selectivity for songs have provided important insights into principles of concurrent behavioral and auditory system development. Relatively little is known about mammalian auditory system development in terms of vocalizations, or other behaviorally relevant sounds. This review suggests echolocating bats are suitable mammalian model systems to understand development of auditory behaviors. The simplicity of echolocation calls with known behavioral relevance and strong neural selectivity provides a platform to address how natural experience shapes cortical receptive field (RF) mechanisms. We summarize recent studies in the pallid bat that followed development of echolocation calls and cortical processing of such calls. We also discuss similar studies in the mustached bat for comparison. These studies suggest: (1) there are different developmental sensitive periods for different acoustic features of the same vocalization. The underlying basis is the capacity for some components of the RF to be modified independent of others. Some RF computations and maps involved in call processing are present even before the cochlea is mature and well before use of echolocation in flight. Others develop over a much longer time course. (2) Normal experience is required not just for refinement, but also for maintenance, of response properties that develop in an experience independent manner. (3) Experience utilizes millisecond range changes in timing of inhibitory and excitatory RF components as substrates to shape vocalization selectivity. We suggest that bat species and call diversity provide a unique opportunity to address developmental constraints in the evolution of neural mechanisms of vocalization processing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.