2017
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postnatal Craniofacial Skeletal Development of Female C57BL/6NCrl Mice

Abstract: The craniofacial skeleton is a complex and unique structure. The perturbation of its development can lead to craniofacial dysmorphology and associated morbidities. Our ability to prevent or mitigate craniofacial skeletal anomalies is at least partly dependent on our understanding of the unique physiological development of the craniofacial skeleton. Mouse models are critical tools for the study of craniofacial developmental abnormalities. However, there is a lack of detailed normative data of mouse craniofacial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in both types of Evc2 cKO, at P8 and P28, we observed insignificant gender-specific differences (Supplementary Table S1 ), particularly in the parameters characterizing mid-facial defects. Lack of gender-specific observations is consistent with previous studies and we, therefore, did not match genders in our comparative analyses ( Vora et al, 2015 ; Wei et al, 2017 ). Therefore, we combined both genders for the rest of our comparisons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, in both types of Evc2 cKO, at P8 and P28, we observed insignificant gender-specific differences (Supplementary Table S1 ), particularly in the parameters characterizing mid-facial defects. Lack of gender-specific observations is consistent with previous studies and we, therefore, did not match genders in our comparative analyses ( Vora et al, 2015 ; Wei et al, 2017 ). Therefore, we combined both genders for the rest of our comparisons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This age range was selected because they have relatively thinner skulls than adult mouse, which is a suitable choice for imaging inside or through their skull. This age range is particularly interesting for imaging, because the neurogenesis in the cortical layers peak in P12-P17 [7], but bone maturation has not peaked yet [6], which makes it suitable for neuroimaging, as well as bone and developmental research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the layers of collagenous fibers and mineralization create a multiple-scattering [3][4][5] regime for light propagation even in relatively thin juvenile cranial bone, although at a smaller scale. The juvenile age range was selected because the mouse skull is still in development, and due to it being less mineralized and thinner [6] it shows a larger isoplanatic patch (IP). However since neurogenesis in cortical layers peaks at 11-17 days postnatally [7], this age group can be used in neuroimaging, as well as bone and developmental biology research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skulls were measured by using Micro-CT (eXplore Locus SP, GE Healthcare Pre-Clinical Imaging, London, ON, Canada) and digital caliper (Fowler 6"/150 mm Ultra-Cal V, Sylvac SA) as previously described (Wei et al 2017). Micro-CT images were reoriented and reconstructed to 3D through Microview (version 2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%