2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04144-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postmortem study of organ-specific toxicity in glioblastoma patients treated with a combination of temozolomide, irinotecan and bevacizumab

Abstract: Systemic monotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV); two-drug combinations, such as Irinotecan (IRI) and BEV, TMZ and BEV and a three-drug combination with TMZ, IRI and BEV (TIB) have been used in treating patients with progressive high-grade gliomas including glioblastoma. Most patients tolerated these regimens well with well-established sides effects of hypertension, proteinuria, and reversible clinical myelosuppression (CM). However, organ-speci c toxicities have never been examined by postmor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a time lag between the final imaging examination before death and at death, and the final imaging examination before death may not accurately assess the condition during an autopsy. An MRI examination of the autopsied brain can compensate for this time difference [ 3 , 9 ]. The benefits of postmortem MRI are that it produces a clear image without body motion or pulsating echoes of cerebrospinal fluid and blood, allowing for the comparison of images and pathology in the exact same plane, and does not consider the possibility of lesion progression or change between the time that the MRI is taken and the pathology specimen is examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is a time lag between the final imaging examination before death and at death, and the final imaging examination before death may not accurately assess the condition during an autopsy. An MRI examination of the autopsied brain can compensate for this time difference [ 3 , 9 ]. The benefits of postmortem MRI are that it produces a clear image without body motion or pulsating echoes of cerebrospinal fluid and blood, allowing for the comparison of images and pathology in the exact same plane, and does not consider the possibility of lesion progression or change between the time that the MRI is taken and the pathology specimen is examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, tumor cell features such as high invasive capacity and proliferative ability can cause serious brain dysfunctions, such as paralysis and impaired consciousness. In such intractable tumors, brain specimens obtained at autopsies are useful not only for understanding the pathology of brain tumors but also for elucidating the effects of treatment and its relationship to the primary brain tissue [ 3 ]. However, final magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before death does not accurately reflect the pathology at the time of autopsy because of the time difference between the time of autopsy and the time of final MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used to evaluate adverse effects during the treatment(s) and follow-up period. 10 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%