Abstract:Postmortem microbiology (PMM) is a valuable tool in the identification of the cause of death and of factors contributory to death where death has been caused by infection. The value of PMM is dependent on careful autopsy planning, appropriate sampling, minimisation of postmortem bacterial translocation and avoidance of sample contamination. Interpretation of PMM results requires careful consideration in light of the clinical history, macroscopic findings and the histological appearances of the tissues. This co… Show more
“…Their detection may be a result of contamination, postmortem translocation from nonsterile sites, or molecular amplification of pathogens not directly responsible for the cause of death, reflecting past infection or “normal” microbiota. 19 , 30 Many of the cases had some degree of malnutrition and 5 were HIV positive, each of which might have played a role in weakening response to infections and might partially explain the presence of multiple pathogens. In our study, P. jirovecii was a common etiology of pneumonia, the only etiologic agent assigned to cause of death in 4 of the 7 cases in which it was identified.…”
“…Their detection may be a result of contamination, postmortem translocation from nonsterile sites, or molecular amplification of pathogens not directly responsible for the cause of death, reflecting past infection or “normal” microbiota. 19 , 30 Many of the cases had some degree of malnutrition and 5 were HIV positive, each of which might have played a role in weakening response to infections and might partially explain the presence of multiple pathogens. In our study, P. jirovecii was a common etiology of pneumonia, the only etiologic agent assigned to cause of death in 4 of the 7 cases in which it was identified.…”
“…The main limitations of this study are considered to lie in the acceptance of the clinical and autopsy diagnoses without verifying the criteria and confirming the validity of the conclusions. It was not determined if pathologists performed optimal microbiological investigations 5,14 in all cases. Nonetheless, as a first study of the contribution of medico-legal autopsy to the investigation of death following a clinical diagnosis of sepsis, useful information has been obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autopsy can provide useful microbiological information in cases of sepsis. 5 However, the medico-legal autopsy generally does not focus on issues of medical audit, education and research. Consequently, following a diagnosis of sepsis, it appears it would be beneficial for clinicians to request an autopsy through the hospital system, unless there are mandatory reporting issues surrounding a death that necessitate referral into the coronial or other medico-legal system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This study aimed to determine how frequently a coronial autopsy provided contributory information when the clinical opinion was that death had resulted from sepsis. Due to difficulties surrounding post-mortem microbiology, 5 it was hypothesised that in the majority of cases an autopsy would not provide contributory information regarding the source of sepsis that was not known before death.…”
This study sought to determine how often a medico-legal (coronial) autopsy contributes by identifying the source of infection when there has been a clinical diagnosis of sepsis prior to death. Autopsy reports were retrieved in which it was documented there had been a clinical diagnosis of sepsis preceding death. The autopsy report was reviewed to determine if a source for sepsis had been identified. It was found the autopsy was contributory in this respect in less than one fifth of all cases (35 of 198, 18%). It was also determined if there was a post-autopsy diagnosis of sepsis or if sepsis was excluded by a definite alternative diagnosis. During the study, of the 198 cases, sepsis was excluded by an alternative diagnosis in 78 (39%). Thus, the autopsy may be of more application to confirming or excluding a diagnosis of sepsis than identifying a source for sepsis.
“…If sepsis, bacteremia or other conditions are suspected, it is recommended to add samples from other tissues (Table 1). [19][20][21]. According to the method of MIA used, the aim would be to replicate these samples as much as possible.…”
Section: General Post-mortem Microbiology Sampling Techniquementioning
This manuscript aims to: 1) provide specific guidelines on PMM techniques in the setting of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), both for pathologists collecting samples and for microbiologists advising pathologists and interpreting the results and 2) introduce standardization in PMM sampling at MIA. Post-mortem microbiology (PMM) is crucial to identify the causative organism in deaths due to infection. MIA including the use of post-mortem (PM) computed tomography (CT) and PM magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is increasingly carried out as a complement or replacement for the traditional PM. In this setting, mirroring the traditional autopsy, PMM aims to: detect infectious organisms causing sudden unexpected deaths; confirm clinically suspected but unproven infection; evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy; identify emergent pathogens; and recognize medical diagnostic errors. Meaningful interpretation of PMM results requires careful evaluation in the context of the clinical history, macroscopic and microscopic findings.These guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary team with experts in various fields of microbiology and pathology on behalf of the ESGFOR (ESCMID -European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases -Study Group of Forensic and Post-mortem Microbiology, in collaboration with the ESP -European Society of Pathology-) based on a literature search and the author's expertise. Microbiological sampling methods for MIA are presented for various scenarios: adults, children, developed and developing countries. Concordance between MIA and conventional invasive autopsy is substantial for children and adults and moderate for neonates and maternal deaths. Networking and closer collaboration among microbiologists and pathologists
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.