2001
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-07-02501.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postlearning Consolidation of Birdsong: Stabilizing Effects of Age and Anterior Forebrain Lesions

Abstract: Birdsong is a learned, sequenced motor skill. For the zebra finch, learned song normally remains unchanging beyond early adulthood. However, stable adult song will gradually deteriorate after deafening (Nordeen and Nordeen, 1992), indicating an ongoing influence of auditory feedback on learned song. This plasticity of adult song in response to deafening gradually declines with age (Lombardino and Nottebohm, 2000), suggesting that, after song learning, there continue to be changes in the brain that progressivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
125
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
13
125
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results extend the finding of variability regulation from syllable structure to syllable sequencing and suggest that plasticity of syllable sequencing could also be heightened during UD song. Furthermore, our results are consistent with the possibility that species differences in the intrinsic variability of syllable sequencing are correlated with differences in the plasticity of syllable sequencing in adult song; syllable sequencing in adult Bengalese finch song is more variable than in zebra finch song, and adult Bengalese finches demonstrate more rapid plasticity of sequencing following manipulations of auditory feedback than adult zebra finches (Brainard and Doupe 2001;Nordeen and Nordeen 1992;Okanoya and Yamaguchi 1997;Sakata and Brainard 2006;Scott et al 2000;Woolley and Rubel 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results extend the finding of variability regulation from syllable structure to syllable sequencing and suggest that plasticity of syllable sequencing could also be heightened during UD song. Furthermore, our results are consistent with the possibility that species differences in the intrinsic variability of syllable sequencing are correlated with differences in the plasticity of syllable sequencing in adult song; syllable sequencing in adult Bengalese finch song is more variable than in zebra finch song, and adult Bengalese finches demonstrate more rapid plasticity of sequencing following manipulations of auditory feedback than adult zebra finches (Brainard and Doupe 2001;Nordeen and Nordeen 1992;Okanoya and Yamaguchi 1997;Sakata and Brainard 2006;Scott et al 2000;Woolley and Rubel 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In zebra finches, songs produced to females are faster than songs produced in isolation (Cooper and Goller 2006;Kao and Brainard 2006;Sossinka and Böhner 1980), and lesions of IMAN lead to a gradual acceleration of song and an attenuation of context effects on song tempo (Brainard and Doupe 2001;Kao and Brainard 2006;Williams and Mehta 1999). Alterations in vocal quality are often reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (Goberman et al 2005;reviewed in Pinto 2004), and interference with dopamine function alters the bandwidth of ultrasonic vocalizations in rats (Ciucci et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mechanisms governing juvenile song acquisition and adult error correction might be distinct, it is possible that they rely on the same underlying computation. Although the absolute size of errors in young birds is very large, so is the variability of song itself (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Constraining learning based on variability (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairing-induced potentiation in male adult zebra finches provides a possible mechanism underlying active song maintenance in adult songbirds and could also contribute to song degradation known to occur after manipulation of the auditory feedback (Woolley and Rubel, 1997;Leonardo and Konishi, 1999;Lombardino and Nottebohm, 2000;Brainard and Doupe, 2001) or tracheosyringeal nerve injury (Williams and Mehta, 1999). We next tested whether this form of LTP is also present in young zebra finches undergoing song learning.…”
Section: Ltp Is Present In Juvenile Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTP is inducible in adult and juvenile birds, suggesting that it may contribute to song degradation in adult birds, induced by manipulations of auditory feedback or sectioning of tracheosyringeal nerves (Woolley and Rubel, 1997;Leonardo and Konishi, 1999;Williams and Mehta, 1999;Lombardino and Nottebohm, 2000;Brainard and Doupe, 2001), and to sensorimotor learning in juvenile birds. Although our inability to induce LTP in younger birds does not necessarily exclude its presence, the difficulty suggests that this form of plasticity may not play a primary role during sensory learning.…”
Section: Functional Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%