1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(94)90982-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postirradiation examination of BEATRIX-II, phase I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of these extreme conditions, Li20 and Li2Zr03 performed very well; Li20 exhibited good tritium release throughout the irradiation, and this was confirmed by a measured vety low tritium inventory [34]. Ceramic integrity was maintained during irradiation (burnup 5Yo), although some structure changes and swelling occurred along with a very small loss of lithium [34,35].…”
Section: Irradiation Performance -Laboratory and [N-reactor Testsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of these extreme conditions, Li20 and Li2Zr03 performed very well; Li20 exhibited good tritium release throughout the irradiation, and this was confirmed by a measured vety low tritium inventory [34]. Ceramic integrity was maintained during irradiation (burnup 5Yo), although some structure changes and swelling occurred along with a very small loss of lithium [34,35].…”
Section: Irradiation Performance -Laboratory and [N-reactor Testsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Ceramic integrity was maintained during irradiation (burnup 5Yo), although some structure changes and swelling occurred along with a very small loss of lithium [34,35]. For Li2Zr03 at this burnup level, tritium release was constant, with no indication that second phase formation degrades tritium release behavior.…”
Section: Irradiation Performance -Laboratory and [N-reactor Testsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the tritium recovery rate of 1,000 ppmH 2 became the same as the value at 10,000 ppmH 2 after about 5 h from changing the hydrogen content. In the BEATRIX-II, [7][8][9] increasing the hydrogen content in sweep gas resulted in a transient tritium recovery peak which indicated a decrease in tritium inventory in the specimen. Decreasing hydrogen concentration from the reference sweep gas (1,000 ppmH 2 ) resulted in an increase in the tritium inventory.…”
Section: Irradiation Test With Multi-layered Pebble-bed Mockupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of in-situ irradiation experiments is the capability to provide a neutron flux over a large volume prior to the availability of a fusion reactor. As the recent insitu irradiation tests, CRITIC-III (Canada), 6) BEATRIX-II (US/Japan/Canada), [7][8][9] EXOTIC (Netherlands/EU) [10][11][12] and others were conducted. However, these experiments used relatively small amount of specimen for characterization of tritium breeders and the structures of a fusion blanket have not been simulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of in situ irradiation experiments is its capability to provide such information with respect to neutron flux over a large volume prior to availability of a fusion reactor. Up to now, in situ irradiation tests such as CRITIC-III (Canada) [1], BEATRIX-II (US/ Japan/Canada) [2][3][4], EXOTIC (Netherlands/EU) [5][6][7] and others were conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%