2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posting and transfer: key to fostering trust in government health services

Abstract: Appropriate deployment or posting and transfer (P&T) of health workers – placing the right people in the right positions at the right time – lies at the heart of fostering communities’ faith in government health services and cementing the role of the health system as a core social institution. The authors of this paper have been involved in an ongoing transnational dialogue about P&T practices and determinants. This dialogue seeks to call attention to the importance of P&T as a health system function; to urge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the fact that initially there were few actors in the decision-making arena limited the presence of competing agendas and disagreements. However, while this led to the re-establishment of a HRH recruitment system, the fact that the focus of our analysis rests predominantly on recruitment processes and doctors (rather than on other HR management issues or on other health professionals) highlights how these elements were priorities for policy-makers at central level, while other cadres and issues (such as, deployment) remained under-regulated and dealt with at decentralised level, with the lack of overall strategy and clear official policies to enact, as documented also elsewhere [ 11 , 12 , 54 ]. Additionally, policy-makers paid little or no attention to health workers’ job preferences [ 45 , 55 ] and decision-making remained a top-down exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, the fact that initially there were few actors in the decision-making arena limited the presence of competing agendas and disagreements. However, while this led to the re-establishment of a HRH recruitment system, the fact that the focus of our analysis rests predominantly on recruitment processes and doctors (rather than on other HR management issues or on other health professionals) highlights how these elements were priorities for policy-makers at central level, while other cadres and issues (such as, deployment) remained under-regulated and dealt with at decentralised level, with the lack of overall strategy and clear official policies to enact, as documented also elsewhere [ 11 , 12 , 54 ]. Additionally, policy-makers paid little or no attention to health workers’ job preferences [ 45 , 55 ] and decision-making remained a top-down exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The authors' previous experience in conducting HRH related research suggests there are gaps between HRH policy and its implementation, and the expectations of doctors. Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR), specifically around HRM policies and systems suggests similar issues where such policies and systems are perceived to be bureaucratic, slow, sporadic, 'mission inconsistent', open to corruption, and disrupting career trajectories for doctors (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Hence HRH related policy implementation and the methods that can examine it in public health sector is a critical that needs attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How and why the health workforce is deployed across geographic settings is foundational to the delivery of public services because it affects attainment of health goals like universal health coverage through issues of maldistribution, absenteeism, poor morale, decreased efficiencies, and lowered health system accountability. The limited evidence to date shows that postings and transfers are mediated by a variety of complex factors, such as public administration standards, labour market forces, political dynamics, professional power, human resource management systems and accountability mechanisms [ 3 ]. There is much literature from Ghana and other low- and middle-income countries identifying factors which influence staff preferences to take up or stay in posts, such as remuneration, career progression opportunities, facility infrastructure and social amenities (e.g., schools for children, employment for spouses, road networks, and accommodation) [ 4 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%