2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0940-9602(01)80168-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postinflammatory changes of the diaphragmatic stomata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The intercellular spaces as preferable sites for the exocytosis of LB confirm the hypothesis for a safe defense against the frictional damage, and as a barrier to both protein leakage and pathogen invasion by spanning cell junctions (Whitaker et al 1982;Hills 2000). The validity of this conception is justified by the larger particles visible by SEM in the vicinity of effective diaphragmatic openings-stomata, which showed a significant increase in number and dimensions after peritonitis, according to our previous results (Michailova et al 2001B). We suggest that a larger number of the intercellular contacts between the cubic mesothelial cells, especially by the activated cells, ensure numerous places for exocytosis of the LB like other lamellar formations, compared to the non-activated mesothelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The intercellular spaces as preferable sites for the exocytosis of LB confirm the hypothesis for a safe defense against the frictional damage, and as a barrier to both protein leakage and pathogen invasion by spanning cell junctions (Whitaker et al 1982;Hills 2000). The validity of this conception is justified by the larger particles visible by SEM in the vicinity of effective diaphragmatic openings-stomata, which showed a significant increase in number and dimensions after peritonitis, according to our previous results (Michailova et al 2001B). We suggest that a larger number of the intercellular contacts between the cubic mesothelial cells, especially by the activated cells, ensure numerous places for exocytosis of the LB like other lamellar formations, compared to the non-activated mesothelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The increased peritoneal or pleural fluid loads were used in order to study the effect of a Δ P TD change on the diaphragmatic tracer distribution. No signs of local or systemic inflammation developed in our acute short‐term experiments, in which, unlike what observed in clinical stages of pleural effusion or ascitis (Michailova, 2001), the permeability of the pleural and peritoneal mesothelia and of the lymphatic endothelium are presumably still normal. Therefore, we believe the present experimental approach is best suited for following dextran progression into the diaphragmatic lymphatics down an imposed pressure gradient.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The peritoneal and pleural surfaces of the diaphragm are both lined by mesothelial cells, and beneath this layer lies a network of lymphatics (42)(43)(44). On the peritoneal side, small openings (stomata) connect the peritoneal cavity with these diaphragmatic lymphatics, and tracer studies have revealed that substances injected intraperitoneally are capable of attaining the lymphatics as well as connective tissue spaces of the diaphragm (42).…”
Section: Preferential Weakness Of the Diaphragmmentioning
confidence: 99%