2014
DOI: 10.3167/ghs.2014.070104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posthumous Rescue: The Shafia Young Women as Worthy Victims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 In May of 2008, the Law Commission released its review of the law concerning the extent to which a jury in a criminal trial is made aware of the prior convictions of an accused person and allegations of similar offending on their part.50 The commission received this reference as a result of public anger about the fact that the jury had not been permitted to know that Schollum and Shipton had been convicted of similar offences with respect to another complainant when they were tried for sexual offences with respect to Nicholas and the third complainant. Significantly, although the commission's response to its particular terms of reference was disappointingly conservative,51 it expressed strong dis- 48 After the report was released, the Commissioner of Police at the time, Howard Broad, said, "I find it difficult to express in words my feelings about these people for they have caused immeasurable damage to a number of New Zealanders that they had sworn to protect. I unreservedly and unequivocally apologise to the women who were caught up in the actions of those few officers [emphasis mine].…”
Section: The Fall Outmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…49 In May of 2008, the Law Commission released its review of the law concerning the extent to which a jury in a criminal trial is made aware of the prior convictions of an accused person and allegations of similar offending on their part.50 The commission received this reference as a result of public anger about the fact that the jury had not been permitted to know that Schollum and Shipton had been convicted of similar offences with respect to another complainant when they were tried for sexual offences with respect to Nicholas and the third complainant. Significantly, although the commission's response to its particular terms of reference was disappointingly conservative,51 it expressed strong dis- 48 After the report was released, the Commissioner of Police at the time, Howard Broad, said, "I find it difficult to express in words my feelings about these people for they have caused immeasurable damage to a number of New Zealanders that they had sworn to protect. I unreservedly and unequivocally apologise to the women who were caught up in the actions of those few officers [emphasis mine].…”
Section: The Fall Outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Others may hold contrary views.47 It is well-known, however, that regardless of which view is preferred from a strictly legal perspective, the general experience of women and children in Canada under the current arrangement is one of violation of their rights to security of the person and equal protection, benefit, and enjoyment of the law under ss 7, 15, and 28 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as a violation of their human rights under international law, contrary to the obligations the government of Canada has assumed under international covenants and conventions. 48 In these circumstances, it is incumbent on the federal government to take concrete steps to assume its responsibilities for enforcement of the criminal laws prohibiting all forms of criminal violence, exploitation, and coercion against women and children.49 46 Carter examines the tension between the expectation that prosecutorial authority will be exercised in a quasi-judicial and hence apolitical manner and "indications from the provinces that prosecutorial resources will not be invested in certain federal criminal law initiatives which are 'politically' unpopular" (at 168). 47 See, for example, R v Catagas (1978), 38 CCC (2d) 296 (Man CA), concluding that an explicit policy of non-prosecution of Aboriginals hunting on Crown land in violation of the federal Migratory Birds Convention Act, RSC 1970, c M 12 was "a clear case of the exercise of a purported dispensing power by executive action in favour of a particular group" and, as such, was null and void on the ground that "the Crown may not by executive action dispense with the laws" (at 301).…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations